PreprintCited by 4Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain CT Registration Using Hybrid Supervised Convolutional Neural Network

Open access
Yuan, Hongmei, Yang, MingLei, Qian, Shan, Wang, WenXin, Jia, XiaoTian, Huang, Feng·2021·BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s12938-021-00971-8 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: Brain computed tomography (CT) image registration is an essential step in the image evaluation of acute cerebrovascular disease (ACVD). Due to the complexity of human brain morphology, low brain CT soft-tissue resolution, low gray/white matter contrast, and the large anatomy variation across individuals, it is still a great challenge to perform brain CT registration accurately and rapidly. This study developed a hybrid supervised convolutional neural network (HSCN-Net) which may be used for assessment of ACVD in brain CT.Method: HSCN-Net generates synthetic deformation fields by a simulator to solve the lack of registration gold standard. The simulator are used to generate multi-scale deformation fields to overcome the registration challenge of large deformation. HSCN-Net adopts a hybrid loss function constituted by deformation field and image similarity to improve registration accuracy and generalization ability. In this work, one hundred and one brain CT images were included for HSCN-Net training and evaluation, and the results were compared with Demons and VoxelMorph. Qualitative analysis by visual evaluation, as well as quantitative analysis by Endpoint Error (EPE) between deformation fields, image Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), and Dice coefficient were carried out to access the model performance.Results: Qualitative analysis of HSCN-Net was similar to that of Demons, and both were superior to that of VoxelMorph. Moreover, HSCN-Net was more competent for large and smooth deformations. For quantitative evaluation, the EPE mean of HSCN-Net (3.29 mm) was lower than that of Demons (3.47 mm) and VoxelMorph (5.12 mm); the Dice mean of HSCN-Net was 0.96, which was better than that of Demons (0.90) and VoxelMorph (0.87); and the NMI mean of HSCN-Net (0.83) was slightly lower than that of Demons(0.84) but higher than that of VoxelMorph (0.81). In addition, the mean registration time of HSCN-Net (17.86 s) was lower than that of VoxelMorph (18.53 s) and Demons (147.21 s).Conclusion: The proposed hybrid supervised convolution registration network can achieve accurate and rapid brain CT registration. It is helpful for improving image evaluation of ACVD, thereby assisting clinicians in diagnosis and treatment decision-making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-779429/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Registration results of a typical brain CT image: a is the reference image; b is the moving image; and c–e are the registration results of HSCN-Net, Demons, and VoxelMorph algorithms, respectively; f–h are the local enlarged images corresponding to the same parts in c–e. All the three registration methods can achieve spatial matching. Compared with the ventricle in e, that in c and d had better spatial matching. The deformations in f and h were smoother than those in g and were highly consistent with the smooth characteristics of tissue deformation
Fig. 1 Registration results of a typical brain CT image: a is the reference image; b is the moving image; and c–e are the registration results of HSCN-Net, Demons, and VoxelMorph algorithms, respectively; f–h are the local enlarged images corresponding to the same parts in c–e. All the three registration methods can achieve spatial matching. Compared with the ventricle in e, that in c and d had better spatial matching. The deformations in f and h were smoother than those in g and were highly consistent with the smooth characteristics of tissue deformationCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Framework of HSCN-Net. We used a simulator to generate synthetic deformation fields and images during training to address the lack of registration gold standards. Large deformations of appropriate proportions were added to the synthetic deformation fields to overcome the challenge of large deformation fields between the images to be registered. HSCN-Net adopts a hybrid supervised loss function that is constituted by the alignment accuracy of the deformation fields and image similarity to improve the registration accuracy and generalization capability of the model
Fig. 2 Framework of HSCN-Net. We used a simulator to generate synthetic deformation fields and images during training to address the lack of registration gold standards. Large deformations of appropriate proportions were added to the synthetic deformation fields to overcome the challenge of large deformation fields between the images to be registered. HSCN-Net adopts a hybrid supervised loss function that is constituted by the alignment accuracy of the deformation fields and image similarity to improve the registration accuracy and generalization capability of the modelCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Yuan, H., Yang, M., Qian, S., Wang, W., Jia, X., & Huang, F.
Affiliations
  • Neusoft (China) (CN)
  • Neusoft Medical Systems Co., Ltd. (China) (CN)
  • Shenyang Advanced Medical Equipment Technology Incubation Center,Co.Ltd.
Corresponding author
Yang, MingLei
Venue
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Published
2021-08-09
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
131-131
ISSN
1475-925X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225781432
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMedical Engineering OnLine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Shenyang Science and Technology Bureau
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
image registration, hybrid loss function, acute cerebrovascular disease, demons, VoxelMorph, endpoint error, registration speed, brain CT images
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review