PreprintCited by 2Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

MEF2C controls lysosomal and lipid clearance programs linked to Alzheimer’s disease risk in macrophages

Open access
Goate, Alison, Podlesny-Drabiniok, Anna, Kim, Jeanne, Bezemer, Lotte, Patel, Tulsi, Cheng, Haoxiang, Sewell, Michael, Montecillo, Mia +4 more·2026·Research Square

Abstract

Risk alleles for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are enriched in myeloid cis-regulatory elements, implicating myeloid gene-regulatory networks in disease susceptibility. A conserved lipid-associated transcriptional signature—spanning disease-associated microglia and peripheral lipid-associated macrophages (DLAM)—emerges across neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases characterized by lipid overload, yet the transcriptional regulators of this gene expression program remain incompletely defined. Here, we show that MEF2C—a candidate AD risk gene—is a master DLAM regulator. Using MEF2C knockout and knockdown in human iPSC-derived microglia and macrophages, we found that total or partial MEF2C loss is sufficient to induce DLAM-associated transcriptional, epigenomic, and functional remodeling, including enhanced lysosomal activity and cholesterol efflux. Integration of chromatin accessibility and regulatory epigenetic profiles with functionally informed fine-mapping linked candidate causal variants in AD risk loci to MEF2C-regulated cis-regulatory elements that target candidate AD risk genes at these loci. In a triculture model of AD, microglial MEF2C loss is associated with an increased DLAM population and a reduced Aβ42/40 ratio, supporting context-dependent reprogramming of microglia as a potential biological mechanism to modulate AD-relevant pathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9164252/v1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disease-associated, lipid-associated, and potentially suppressive microglial programs may emerge when key myeloid transcription factors are shifted quantitatively rather than completely removed.

    “Disease-associated, lipid-associated, and potentially suppressive microglial programs may emerge when key myeloid transcription factors are shifted quantitatively rather than completely removed.”

    From Lymphoid-like Suppressive Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: A New Neuroimmune Regulatory Axis? (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results section on partial MEF2C reduction in iPSC-derived microglia (page unavailable) reports increased DLAM markers without complete removal of MEF2C. The Discussion also describes MEF2C reduction as polarizing microglia toward disease- and lipid-associated states. Our copy does not establish that partial reduction induces a suppressive microglial program; suppression of homeostatic or proliferative genes is not the same claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Podlesny-Drabiniok et al. linked MEF2C-regulated regulatory elements to candidate Alzheimer's disease risk genes and showed that, in a human triculture model containing Alzheimer's disease neurons and astrocytes, MEF2C-deficient microglia were associated with an increased DLAM population and a reduced Aβ42/40 ratio.

    “Importantly, the authors linked MEF2C-regulated regulatory elements to candidate Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and showed that, in a human triculture model containing Alzheimer’s disease neurons and astrocytes, MEF2C-deficient microglia were associated with an increased DLAM population and a reduced Aβ42/40 ratio [25].”
  • Protective Alzheimer's-associated microglial responses may require precise state tuning rather than broad activation or suppression.

    “These observations strengthen the view that protective Alzheimer ’s-associated microglial responses may require precise state tuning rather than broad activation or suppression.”
  • In human iPSC-derived microglia and macrophage models, total or partial MEF2C reduction was sufficient to induce a DLAM-like state characterized by lysosomal, phagocytic, lipid-handling, and cholesterol-efflux pathways.

    “In human iPSC-derived microglia and macrophage models, total or partial MEF2C reduction was sufficient to induce a DLAM-like state characterized by lysosomal, phagocytic, lipid-handling, and cholesterol-efflux pathways.”
  • Recent work on MEF2C supports the idea that Alzheimer's-associated microglial states are governed by transcription-factor dosage rather than by a simple activated-versus-resting switch.

    “Recent work on MEF2C further supports the idea that Alzheimer ’s-associated microglial states are governed by transcription-factor dosage rather than by a simple activated-versus-resting switch.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. [1]Lambert J.-C., Ramirez A., Grenier-Boley B. & Bellenguez C. Step by step: towards a better understanding of the genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 28, 2716– 2727 (2023). 37131074 PMC10615767
  2. [2]Knopman D. S. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7, 33 (2021). 33986301 PMC8574196
  3. [3]Podleśny-Drabiniok A., Marcora E. & Goate A. M. Microglial phagocytosis: A disease-associated process emerging from Alzheimer’s disease genetics. Trends Neurosci. 43, 965– 979 (2020). 33127097 PMC9080913
  4. [4]Andrews S. J. The complex genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease: novel insights and future directions. EBioMedicine 90, 104511 (2023). 36907103 PMC10024184
  5. [5]Huang K.-L. A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1052– 1061 (2017). 28628103 PMC5759334
  6. [7]Novikova G. Integration of Alzheimer’s disease genetics and myeloid genomics identifies disease risk regulatory elements and genes. Nat. Commun. 12, 1610 (2021). 33712570 PMC7955030
  7. [8]Jones L. Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 5, e13950 (2010). 21085570 PMC2981526
  8. [9]International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium (IGAP). Convergent genetic and expression data implicate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 11, 658– 671 (2015). 25533204 PMC4672734
  9. [10]Kunkle B. W. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414– 430 (2019). 30820047 PMC6463297
  10. [11]Sun N. Human microglial state dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease progression. Cell 186, 4386– 4403.e29 (2023). 37774678 PMC10644954
  11. [12]Gazestani V. Early Alzheimer’s disease pathology in human cortex involves transient cell states. Cell 186, 4438– 4453.e23 (2023). 37774681 PMC11107481
  12. [13]Tuddenham J. F. A cross-disease resource of living human microglia identifies disease-enriched subsets and tool compounds recapitulating microglial states. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 2521– 2537 (2024). 39406950 PMC12094270
  13. [14]Lavin Y. Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 159, 1312– 1326 (2014). 25480296 PMC4437213
  14. [15]Friedman B. A. Diverse Brain Myeloid Expression Profiles Reveal Distinct Microglial Activation States and Aspects of Alzheimer’s Disease Not Evident in Mouse Models. Cell Rep. 22, 832– 847 (2018). 29346778
  15. [16]Olah M. Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 11, 6129 (2020). 33257666 PMC7704703
  16. [17]Jaitin D. A. Lipid-Associated Macrophages Control Metabolic Homeostasis in a Trem2-Dependent Manner. Cell 178, 686– 698.e14 (2019). 31257031 PMC7068689
  17. [18]Zernecke A. Integrated single-cell analysis-based classification of vascular mononuclear phagocytes in mouse and human atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 119, 1676– 1689 (2023). 36190844 PMC10325698
  18. [19]Fernandez D. M. Single-cell immune landscape of human atherosclerotic plaques. Nat. Med. 25, 1576– 1588 (2019). 31591603 PMC7318784
  19. [20]Podleśny-Drabiniok A. BHLHE40/41 regulate microglia and peripheral macrophage responses associated with Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders of lipid-rich tissues. Nat. Commun. 15, 2058 (2024). 38448474 PMC10917780
  20. [21]Lambert J. C. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 1452– 1458 (2013). 24162737 PMC3896259
  21. [22]Barker S. J. MEF2 is a key regulator of cognitive potential and confers resilience to neurodegeneration. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabd7695 (2021). 34731014 PMC9258338
  22. [23]Udeochu J. C. Tau activation of microglial cGAS–IFN reduces MEF2C-mediated cognitive resilience. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 737– 750 (2023). 37095396 PMC10166855
  23. [24]Ali D. Direct targets of MEF2C are enriched for genes associated with schizophrenia and cognitive function and are involved in neuron development and mitochondrial function. PLoS Genet 20, e1011093 (2024). 39259737 PMC11419381
  24. [25]Cooley Coleman J. A. Comprehensive investigation of the phenotype of MEF2C-related disorders in human patients: A systematic review. Am J Med Genet A 185, 3884– 3894 (2021). 34184825
  25. [26]Basu S. The Gene Dose-Dependently Controls Hippocampal Neurogenesis and the Expression of Autism-Like Behaviors. J Neurosci 44, (2024). PMC10860657 38123360
  26. [27]Jaladanki S. K., Elmas A., Malave G. S. & Huang K.-L. Genetic dependency of Alzheimer’s disease-associated genes across cells and tissue types. Sci Rep 11, 12107 (2021). 34103633 PMC8187448
  27. [28]Liu S. Iterative transcription factor screening enables rapid generation of microglia-like cells from human iPSC. Nat. Commun. 16, 5136 (2025). 40494892 PMC12152180
  28. [29]Deczkowska A. Mef2C restrains microglial inflammatory response and is lost in brain ageing in an IFN-I-dependent manner. Nat. Commun. 8, 717 (2017). 28959042 PMC5620041
  29. [30]Hu X. The transcription factor MEF2C restrains microglial overactivation by inhibiting kinase CDK2. Immunity 58, 946– 960.e10 (2025). 40139186
  30. [31]Nguyen C. Transcriptional and epigenetic targets of MEF2C in human microglia contribute to cellular functions related to autism risk and age-related disease. Nat Immunol 26, 1989– 2003 (2025). 41125877 PMC12571900
  31. [32]Sao T. MEF2C mRNA expression and cognitive function in Japanese patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 72, 160– 167 (2018). 29112298
  32. [33]Xue F., Tian J., Yu C., Du H. & Guo L. Type I interferon response-related microglial Mef2c deregulation at the onset of Alzheimer’s pathology in 5×FAD mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 152, 105272 (2021). 33540048 PMC7956132
  33. [34]Kamphuis W., Kooijman L., Schetters S., Orre M. & Hol E. M. Transcriptional profiling of CD11c-positive microglia accumulating around amyloid plaques in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862, 1847– 1860 (2016). 27425031
  34. [35]Keren-Shaul H. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 169, 1276– 1290.e17 (2017). 28602351
  35. [36]Yin Z. Immune hyperreactivity of Aβ plaque-associated microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 55, 115– 122 (2017). 28434692
  36. [37]Hasselmann J. Development of a Chimeric Model to Study and Manipulate Human Microglia In Vivo. Neuron 103, 1016– 1033.e10 (2019). 31375314 PMC7138101
  37. [38]Miedema A. Brain macrophages acquire distinct transcriptomes in multiple sclerosis lesions and normal appearing white matter. Acta Neuropathol Commun 10, 8 (2022). 35090578 PMC8796391
  38. [39]Depuydt M. A. C. Microanatomy of the human atherosclerotic plaque by single-cell transcriptomics. Circ. Res. 127, 1437– 1455 (2020). 32981416 PMC7641189
  39. [40]Cochain C. Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals the Transcriptional Landscape and Heterogeneity of Aortic Macrophages in Murine Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 122, 1661– 1674 (2018). 29545365
  40. [41]Gerrits E. Distinct amyloid-β and tau-associated microglia profiles in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 141, 681– 696 (2021). 33609158 PMC8043951
  41. [43]Dolan M.-J. Exposure of iPSC-derived human microglia to brain substrates enables the generation and manipulation of diverse transcriptional states in vitro. Nat. Immunol. 24, 1382– 1390 (2023). 37500887 PMC10382323
  42. [44]de Paiva Lopes K., Snijders G. J. L. & Humphrey J. Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies. Nature (2022). PMC9245609 34992268
  43. [45]Clark I. C. Microfluidics-free single-cell genomics with templated emulsification. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1557– 1566 (2023). 36879006 PMC10635830
  44. [46]Podleśny-Drabiniok A. Cytokine-induced reprogramming of human macrophages toward Alzheimer’s disease-relevant molecular and cellular phenotypes in vitro. Cell Rep. 44, 115909 (2025). 40570367 PMC12335816
  45. [47]Kiselev V. Y., Yiu A. & Hemberg M. scmap: projection of single-cell RNA-seq data across data sets. Nat. Methods 15, 359– 362 (2018). 29608555
  46. [51]Heinz S. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576– 589 (2010). 20513432 PMC2898526
  47. [52]Takahashi K., Rochford C. D. P. & Neumann H. Clearance of apoptotic neurons without inflammation by microglial triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2. J. Exp. Med. 201, 647– 657 (2005). 15728241 PMC2213053
  48. [53]Bellenguez C. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412– 436 (2022). 35379992 PMC9005347
  49. [54]Cho Y. The basic helix-loop-helix proteins differentiated embryo chondrocyte (DEC) 1 and DEC2 function as corepressors of retinoid X receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 76, 1360– 1369 (2009). 19786558
  50. [55]Sala Frigerio C. The Major Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease: Age, Sex, and Genes Modulate the Microglia Response to Aβ Plaques. Cell Rep. 27, 1293– 1306.e6 (2019). 31018141 PMC7340153
  51. [56]Marschallinger J. Lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia represent a dysfunctional and proinflammatory state in the aging brain. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 194– 208 (2020). 31959936 PMC7595134
  52. [57]Hou J., Chen Y., Grajales-Reyes G. & Colonna M. TREM2 dependent and independent functions of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 17, 84 (2022). 36564824 PMC9783481
  53. [59]Weissbrod O. Functionally informed fine-mapping and polygenic localization of complex trait heritability. Nat Genet 52, 1355– 1363 (2020). 33199916 PMC7710571
  54. [61]Wightman D. P. Author Correction: A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 54, 1062 (2022). 35726068
  55. [62]Park J. A 3D human triculture system modeling neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 941– 951 (2018). 29950669 PMC6800152
  56. [63]Jorfi M. Infiltrating CD8+ T cells exacerbate Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a 3D human neuroimmune axis model. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1489– 1504 (2023). 37620442 PMC11184920
  57. [64]McQuade A. Transcriptional regulation of disease-relevant microglial activation programs. bioRxiv 2025.10.12.681832 (2025) doi: 10.1101/2025.10.12.681832. PMC13505846 42526428 · DOI
  58. [65]Wu Y. & Eisel U. L. M. Microglia-Astrocyte Communication in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 95, 785– 803 (2023). 37638434 PMC10578295
  59. [66]Mallach A. Microglia-astrocyte crosstalk in the amyloid plaque niche of an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model, as revealed by spatial transcriptomics. Cell Rep 43, 114216 (2024). 38819990
  60. [67]Liddelow S. A. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541, 481– 487 (2017). 28099414 PMC5404890
  61. [68]Serrano-Pozo A. Astrocyte transcriptomic changes along the spatiotemporal progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci 27, 2384– 2400 (2024). 39528672 PMC11614739
  62. [69]Dai D. L., Li M. & Lee E. B. Human Alzheimer’s disease reactive astrocytes exhibit a loss of homeostastic gene expression. Acta Neuropathol Commun 11, 127 (2023). 37533101 PMC10398957
  63. [70]Habib N. Disease-associated astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and aging. Nat Neurosci 23, 701– 706 (2020). 32341542 PMC9262034
  64. [71]Mathys H. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 570, 332– 337 (2019). 31042697 PMC6865822
  65. [72]Haage V. HDAC inhibitors engage MITF and the disease-associated microglia signature to enhance amyloid β uptake. Brain Behav Immun 129, 279– 293 (2025). 40451396 PMC12286591
  66. [73]Sun R. & Jiang H. Border-associated macrophages in the central nervous system. Journal of Neuroinflammation 21, 67 (2024). 38481312 PMC10938757
  67. [74]Van Hove H. A single-cell atlas of mouse brain macrophages reveals unique transcriptional identities shaped by ontogeny and tissue environment. Nat Neurosci 22, 1021– 1035 (2019). 31061494
  68. [75]Border-associated macrophages as gatekeepers of brain homeostasis and immunity. Immunity 58, 1085– 1100 (2025). 40324381 PMC12094687
  69. [77]Hammond T. R. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Microglia throughout the Mouse Lifespan and in the Injured Brain Reveals Complex Cell-State Changes. Immunity 50, 253– 271.e6 (2019). 30471926 PMC6655561
  70. [78]Harrington A. J. MEF2C Hypofunction in Neuronal and Neuroimmune Populations Produces MEF2C Haploinsufficiency Syndrome-like Behaviors in Mice. Biol Psychiatry 88, 488– 499 (2020). 32418612 PMC7483399
  71. [79]Li J. H. MEF2C regulates NK cell effector functions through control of lipid metabolism. Nat Immunol 25, 778– 789 (2024). 38589619 PMC12135675
  72. [80]Romero-Molina C., Garretti F., Andrews S. J., Marcora E. & Goate A. M. Microglial efferocytosis: Diving into the Alzheimer’s disease gene pool. Neuron 110, 3513– 3533 (2022). 36327897 PMC13175419
  73. [81]Broekaart D. W. M. Molecular signatures of regional vulnerability to tauopathy in excitatory cortical neurons. Acta neuropathologica 149, (2025). PMC12498291 40481857
  74. [82]Harrington A. J. MEF2C regulates cortical inhibitory and excitatory synapses and behaviors relevant to neurodevelopmental disorders. Elife 5, (2016). PMC5094851 27779093
  75. [83]Morrow E. M. Identifying autism loci and genes by tracing recent shared ancestry. Science 321, 218– 223 (2008). 18621663 PMC2586171
  76. [84]Lee S. H., Bae E.-J., Park S. J. & Lee S.-J. Microglia-driven inflammation induces progressive tauopathies and synucleinopathies. Exp Mol Med 57, 1017– 1031 (2025). 40307569 PMC12130470
  77. [85]Ewels P. A. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol 38, 276– 278 (2020). 32055031
  78. [86]Hoffman G. E. & Roussos P. Dream: powerful differential expression analysis for repeated measures designs. Bioinformatics 37, 192– 201 (2021). 32730587 PMC8055218
  79. [87]Kolberg L. g:Profiler-interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W207– W212 (2023). 37144459 PMC10320099
  80. [88]Subramanian A. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 15545– 15550 (2005). 16199517 PMC1239896
  81. [89]Hao Y. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 293– 304 (2024). 37231261 PMC10928517
  82. [90]Hafemeister C. & Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 20, 296 (2019). 31870423 PMC6927181
  83. [91]Korsunsky I. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289– 1296 (2019). 31740819 PMC6884693
  84. [92]Federico A. & Monti S. hypeR: an R package for geneset enrichment workflows. Bioinformatics 36, 1307– 1308 (2020). 31498385 PMC7998712
  85. [93]Lee D. Plasticity of Human Microglia and Brain Perivascular Macrophages in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. medRxiv: the preprint server for health sciences (2024) doi: 10.1101/2023.10.25.23297558. 42581323 · DOI
  86. [94]Fleming S. J. Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender. Nature Methods 20, 1323– 1335 (2023). 37550580
  87. [95]Germain P.-L., Lun A., Meixide C. G., Macnair W. & Robinson M. D. Doublet identification in single-cell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Research 10, 979 (2022). PMC9204188 35814628
  88. [97]Machlovi S. I. APOE4 confers transcriptomic and functional alterations to primary mouse microglia. Neurobiol. Dis. 164, 105615 (2022). 35031484 PMC8934202
  89. [98]Kreitzer F. R. A robust method to derive functional neural crest cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Am J Stem Cells 2, 119– 131 (2013). 23862100 PMC3708511
  90. [99]McQuade A. Development and validation of a simplified method to generate human microglia from pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Neurodegener. 13, 67 (2018). 30577865 PMC6303871
  91. [100]Schindelin J. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676– 682 (2012). 22743772 PMC3855844
  92. [101]Cahill K. M., Huo Z., Tseng G. C., Logan R. W. & Seney M. L. Improved identification of concordant and discordant gene expression signatures using an updated rank-rank hypergeometric overlap approach. Sci. Rep. 8, 9588 (2018). 29942049 PMC6018631

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goate, A., Podlesny-Drabiniok, A., Kim, J., Bezemer, L., Patel, T., Cheng, H., Sewell, M., Montecillo, M., Church, N., Walley, A., Garretti, F., & Marcora, E.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Venue
Research Square
Published
2026-04-28
OpenAlex
W7156664514
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od026880-01, 1s10od030463-01, UL1TR004419)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG058635, RF1AG054011)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL168174)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI078892)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
MEF2C, Alzheimer's disease, macrophages, microglia, lipid-associated macrophages, lysosomal clearance, cholesterol efflux, lipid metabolism, cis-regulatory elements, chromatin accessibility, epigenetic regulation, amyloid-beta, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review