The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software
Abstract
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. The body of this document is in the public domain Table of contents and index © 1998 Userlab Inc. www.userlab.com 1-800-295-6354 Contact us for additional copies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques
Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L., & Chan, P. (1984) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.1984.6429355 · Cited by 478
The Depth/Breadth Tradeoff in Hierarchical Computer Menus
Miller, D. P. (1981) · Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/107118138102500179 · Cited by 275
Cited by
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533
Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research
Hornbæk, K. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002 · Cited by 1,123
The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design
McFarlane, D. C., & Latorella, K. A. (2002) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1701_1 · Cited by 536
McFarlane, D. C. (2002) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1701_2 · Cited by 378
Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus
Sears, A., & Shneiderman, B. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/174630.174632 · Cited by 293
Design Principles for Generative AI Applications
Weisz, J. D., He, J., Muller, M., Hoefer, G., Miles, R., & Geyer, W. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642466 · Cited by 232
Behavioral Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction
Landauer, T. K. (1997) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50075-3 · Cited by 162
Remote usability evaluations with disabled people.
Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., & Pavan, P. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124942 · Cited by 157
Three Faces of Human-Computer Interaction
Grudin, J. (2005) · IEEE Annals of the History of Computing · doi:10.1109/mahc.2005.67 · Cited by 118
Applying Web Usability Criteria for Vision-Impaired Users: Does It Really Improve Task Performance?
Leporini, B., & Paternò, F. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310701771472 · Cited by 97
Effects of age, speech rate, and environmental support in using telephone voice menu systems
Sharit, J., Czaja, S. J., Nair, S., & Lee, C. C. (2003) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.234.27245 · Cited by 72
A Systematic Literature Review of Research-Derived Touchscreen Design Guidelines for Older Adults
Nurgalieva, L., Jara Laconich, J. J., Baez, M., Casati, F., & Marchese, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2898467 · Cited by 61
“Smith and Mosier [31] refer to guidelines as an encapsulation of expert judgment whose use varies depending on the user.”
BackgroundMendel, J., & Pak, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120905302206 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, S. L., & Mosier, J. N.
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 1986-08-01
- OpenAlex
- W1491233988
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
