The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective
Abstract
Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) has existed as a subfield of AI for less than two decades. DAI is concerned with systems that consist of multiple independent entities that interact in a domain. Traditionally, DAI has been divided into two sub-disciplines: Distributed Problem Solving (DPS) focuses on the information management aspects of systems with several components working together towards a common goal; Multiagent Systems (MAS) deals with behavior management in collections of several independent entities, or agents. This survey of MAS is intended to serve as an introduction to the field and as an organizational framework. A series of general multiagent scenarios are presented. For each scenario, the issues that arise are described along with a sampling of the techniques that exist to deal with them. The presented techniques are not exhaustive, but they highlight how multiagent systems can be and have been used to build complex systems. When options exist, the techniques presented are biased towards machine learning approaches. Additional opportunities for applying machine learning to MAS are highlighted and robotic soccer is presented as an appropriate test bed for MAS. This survey does not focus exclusively on robotic systems. However, we believe that much of the prior research in non-robotic MAS is relevant to robotic MAS, and we explicitly discuss several robotic MAS, including all of those presented in this issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Moore, A. W. (1996) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.301 · Cited by 8,972
Cited by
A Multiagent Approach to Autonomous Intersection Management
Dresner, K., & Stone, P. (2008) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2502 · Cited by 1,304
Self-citationSurvey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Planning of Autonomous Vehicles
Aradi, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3024655 · Cited by 639
Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems
Albrecht, S. V., & Stone, P. (2018) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.01.002 · Cited by 417
Self-citationAd Hoc Autonomous Agent Teams: Collaboration without Pre-Coordination
Stone, P., Kaminka, G., Kraus, S., & Rosenschein, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7529 · Cited by 323
Self-citationA Survey on Transfer Learning for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning Systems
Silva, F. L. D., & Costa, A. H. R. (2019) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11396 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, P., & Veloso, M.
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 1997-12-04
- OpenAlex
- W4240204763
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21236/ada333248
- The paper
- Stone, P., & Veloso, M. (1997). Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada333248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.