Cited by 417Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems

Open access
Albrecht, Stefano V., Stone, Peter·2018·Artificial Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artint.2018.01.002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the previous surveys of related RL subfields have covered zero-shot generalisation in RL explicitly.

    “While there have been previous surveys of related subfields in RL, none have covered zero-shot generalisation in RL explicitly.”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Albrecht and Stone (2018)

  • Modelling other agents can be seen as a form of generalisation problem (even in single-agent RL), if the environment contains a distribution over agents.

    “Albrecht and Stone (2018) survey methods for modelling other agents, which can be seen as a form of generalisation problem (even in single-agent RL), if the environment contains a distribution over agents.”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Albrecht and Stone (2018)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albrecht, S. V., & Stone, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Albrecht, Stefano V.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
258
Pages
66-95
ISSN
0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758442112
Cited by
417
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
27.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Raytheon Company
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-1637736, IIS-1651089, IIS-1724157)
  • Intel Corporation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, agent-based modeling, goal modeling, action prediction, open problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review