The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling Theory of Mind and Cognitive Appraisal with Decision-Theoretic Agents
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eger, M., Martens, C., & Alfaro‐Córdoba, M. (2017) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) · doi:10.1109/cig.2017.8080417 · Cited by 46
Operationalizing Intentionality to Play Hanabi With Human Players
Eger, M., Martens, C., Chacón, P. S., Alfaro‐Córdoba, M., & Hidalgo‐Céspedes, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Games · doi:10.1109/tg.2020.3009359 · Cited by 10
Emotional perception for updating agents' beliefs
Alfonso, B., Pynadath, D. V., Lhommet, M., & Marsella, S. (2015) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii.2015.7344572 · Cited by 8
Self-citationPiao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08691 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Pynadath, D. V., Si, M., & Marsella, S. C.
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 2011-04-07
- OpenAlex
- W4237816060
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- theory of mind, cognitive appraisal, multi-agent systems, agent-based modeling, social cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
