Gardening increases vegetable consumption in school-aged children: a meta-analytical synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Although a handful of published reports suggest that garden-based nutrition education programs are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, many of these studies have low statistical power because of small sample sizes and lack of long-term data. In this study, we used meta-analytical techniques to examine the efficacy of garden-based nutrition education programs for increasing children’s nutrition knowledge, preference for fruit and vegetables, and/or consumption of fruit and vegetables. We confined our analysis to peer-reviewed studies that examined programs that were delivered to children in the United States. We looked at the relative impacts of garden-based nutrition education programs, compared with experimental controls (i.e., no nutrition education) and nutrition education programs without a gardening component. We compared the results of our meta-analysis with those of a vote counting analysis to illustrate the importance of repeated studies and quantitative analysis. In our vote counting analysis, the majority of the outcomes were nonsignificant in the control and nutrition education groups, but positive and significant for the gardening group. Our quantitative analysis of the impacts of gardening education programs on children’s nutrition knowledge, preference for fruit and vegetables, and/or consumption of fruit and vegetables was limited by the small number of studies that reported the full suite of descriptive statistics needed to conduct a meta-analysis. Nonetheless, one striking and robust result emerged: gardening increased vegetable consumption in children, whereas the impacts of nutrition education programs were marginal or nonsignificant. We suggest two nonmutually exclusive hypotheses to explain our results: gardening increases access to vegetables and gardening decreases children’s reluctance to try new foods. Our results suggest that gardening should be an integral component of wellness programs and policies. A historical lack of funding has impeded both the broader adoption of school gardens and rigorous research on the social, behavioral, and academic impacts of gardening on children. Recently, however, there has been an increase in federal support for gardening and garden-based research projects—a trend that we hope will continue and grow.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Engagement in gardening could ensure people have a healthier diet, rich in fruits and vegetables.
“Fourth, and most indirectly, engagement in gardening could ensure people have a healthier diet, rich in fruits and vegetables (Langellotto and Gupta, 2012).”
From Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Langellotto and Gupta, 2012
Cites
Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure
Ebbeling, C. B., Pawlak, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09678-2 · Cited by 2,980 · see citing works
The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.
Cohen, J. (1962) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045186 · Cited by 1,824 · see citing works
Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution
Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89073-4 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Perry, C. L., Bishop, D. B., Taylor, G. L., Davis, M., Story, M., Gray, C., Bishop, S. C., Mays, R. A. W., Lytle, L. A., & Harnack, L. (2004) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198103255530 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis
Soga, M., Gaston, K. J., & Yamaura, Y. (2017) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.007 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
“Fourth, and most indirectly, engagement in gardening could ensure people have a healthier diet, rich in fruits and vegetables (Langellotto and Gupta, 2012).”
BackgroundHowarth, M., Brettle, A., Hardman, M., & Maden, M. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036923 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
- Authors
- Langellotto, G. A., & Gupta, A.
- Venue
- HortTechnology
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 430-445
- ISSN
- 1063-0198 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7714
- OpenAlex
- W2290408261
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- HortTechnology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- school gardens, vegetable consumption, fruit and vegetable preferences, children's nutrition knowledge, school-aged children, food access, willingness to try new foods, school wellness programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review