Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting
Open accessAbstract
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are a potential irradiation source for intensive plant culture systems and photobiological research. They have small size, low mass, a long functional life, and narrow spectral output. In this study, we measured the growth and dry matter partitioning of `Hungarian Wax' pepper (Capsicum annum L.) plants grown under red LEDs compared with similar plants grown under red LEDs with supplemental blue or far-red radiation or under broad spectrum metal halide (MH) lamps. Additionally, we describe the thermal and spectra1 characteristics of these sources. The LEDs used in this study had a narrow bandwidth at half peak height (25 nm) and a focused maximum spectral output at 660 nm for the red and 735 nm for the far-red. Near infrared radiation (800 to 3000 nm) was below detection and thermal infrared radiation (3000 to 50,000 nm) was lower in the LEDs compared to the MH source. Although the red to far-red ratio varied considerably, the calculated phytochrome photostationary state (φ) was only slightly different between the radiation sources. Plant biomass was reduced when peppers were grown under red LEDs in the absence of blue wavelengths compared to plants grown under supplemental blue fluorescent lamps or MH lamps. The addition of far-red radiation resulted in taller plants with greater stem mass than red LEDs alone. There were fewer leaves under red or red plus far-red radiation than with lamps producing blue wavelengths. These results indicate that red LEDs may be suitable, in proper combination with other wavelengths of light, for the culture of plants in tightly controlled environments such as space-based plant culture systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to conventional systems, LED lighting systems have unique advantages such as durability, small size, long operating lifetime, relatively cool emitting surface, a linear photon output with the electrical input current, and the ability to control spectral composition.
“Compared to conventional systems, LED lighting systems have unique advantages such as durability, small size, long operating lifetime, relatively cool emitting surface, a linear photon output with the electrical input current, and the ability to control spectral composition (Brown et al., 1995).”
From Growth, photosynthetic function, and stomatal characteristics of Persian walnut explants in vitro under different light spectra (2023) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 1995
The introductory passage describes LEDs as small, solid-state devices with long lives; the Discussion describes their low heat load and easily manipulated spectral output. The paper does not state that photon output varies linearly with electrical input current, and low heat load on plants does not establish that the emitting surface is cool. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants
McCree, K. J. (1971) · Agricultural Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0002-1571(71)90022-7 · Cited by 1,236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Barta, D.J., D.J. Tennessen, R.J. Bula, and T.W. Tibbitts. 1991. Wheat growth under a light emitting diode source with and without blue photon supplementation. ASGSB Bul. 5(1):51. (Abstr.)
- Barta, D.J., T.W. Tibbitts, R.J Bula, and R.C. Morrow. 1992. Evaluation of light emitting diode characteristics for a space-based plant irradiation source. Adv. Space Res. 12(5):141-149.
- Brown, C.S. and A.C. Schuerger. 1993. Growth of pepper, lettuce and cucumber under light emitting diodes. Plant Physiol. 102(1):88. (Abstr.)
- In L.C. Sage (ed.). Pigment of the imagination. Academic Press, London.
- Sager, J.C., W.O. Smith , J.L. Edwards and K.L. Cyr. 1988. Photosyn- thetic efficiency and phytochrome photoequilibria determination using spectral data. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 31(6):1882-1889.
- Senger, H. 1984. Blue light effects in biological systems. Springer Verlag, J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 120(5):808-813. 1995.
- Wheeler, R.M., C.L. Mackowiak, and J.C. Sager. 1991. Soybean stem growth under high-pressure sodium with supplemental blue lighting. Agron. J. 83(5):903-906.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hogewoning, S. W., Trouwborst, G., Maljaars, H., Poorter, H., van Ieperen, W., & Harbinson, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq132 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Lin, K.-H., Huang, M.-Y., Huang, W.-D., Hsu, M.-H., Yang, Z.-W., & Yang, C.-M. (2013) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.002 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red- and blue-light-emitting diodes
Kim, H.-H., Goins, G. D., Wheeler, R. M., & Sager, J. C. (2004) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.7.1617 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Self-citationAtta, M., Idris, A., Bukhari, A., & Wahidin, S. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.162 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Blue light effects on rose photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis
Abidi, F., Girault, T., Douillet, O., Guillemain, G., Sintes, G., Laffaire, M., Ahmed, H. B., Smiti, S., Huché‐Thélier, L., & Leduc, N. (2013) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00603.x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Saeedi, S. A., Vahdati, K., Sarikhani, S., Daylami, S. D., Davarzani, M., Gruda, N. S., & Aliniaeifard, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1292045 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, C. S., Schuerger, A. C., & Sager, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Kennedy Space Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 808-813
- ISSN
- 0003-1062 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9788
- OpenAlex
- W2123072477
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Keywords
- red light-emitting diodes, pepper, Capsicum annuum, photomorphogenesis, far-red light, biomass allocation, plant growth, metal halide lamps
- MeSH terms
- Capsicum, Infrared Rays, Light, Lighting, Plants, Medicinal, Plant Leaves, Biomass, Plant Stems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review