The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bones of Contention: Animals and Religion in Contemporary Japan
Abstract
Since the 1990s the Japanese pet industry has grown to a trillion-yen business and estimates place the number of pets above the number of children under the age of fifteen. There are between 6,000 to 8,000 businesses in the Japanese pet funeral industry, including more than 900 pet cemeteries. Of these about 120 are operated by Buddhist temples, and Buddhist mortuary rites for pets have become an institutionalized practice. This book investigates what religious and intellectual traditions constructed animals as subjects of religious rituals and how pets have been included or excluded in the necral landscapes of contemporary Japan. Pet mortuary rites are emblems of the ongoing changes in contemporary Japanese religions. The book sheds light on important questions such as: Who (or what) counts as a family member? What kinds of practices should the state recognize as religious and thus protect financially and legally? Is it frivolous or selfish to keep, pamper, or love an animal? Should humans and pets be buried together? How do people reconcile the deeply personal grief that follows the loss of a pet and how do they imagine the afterlife of pets? And ultimately, what is the status of animals in Japan?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As I demonstrated in an earlier publication, memorial rites for animals such as whales, livestock, and pets emerged during this period (Ambros 2012).”
From Tracing the Influence of Ming-Qing Buddhism in Early Modern Japan: Yunqi Zhuhong’s Tract on Refraining from Killing and on Releasing Life and Ritual Animal Releases (2021) · cites this paper as Ambros 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why Scholars of Religion Must Investigate the Corporate Form
McLaughlin, L., Rots, A. P., Thomas, J. B., & Watanabe, C. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfaa041 · Cited by 33
Ambros, B. R. (2019) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel10040279 · Cited by 15
Self-citationAnimals in Japanese Buddhism: The Third Path of Existence
Ambros, B. (2014) · Religion Compass · doi:10.1111/rec3.12118 · Cited by 9
Self-citationAmbros, B. R. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12100889 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ambros, B. R.
- Corresponding author
- Ambros, Barbara R.
- ORCID
- Ambros, Barbara R.
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawai'i Press
- Published
- 2012-09-10
- OpenAlex
- W4251786835
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- pet cemeteries, human-animal relations, animal status, state recognition of religion, contemporary Japanese religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review