The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Environment and Quality
Abstract
Plant environment often exerts its greatest influence over herbage quality by altering leaf/stem ratios, but it also causes other morphological modifications and changes in chemical composition of plant parts. Temperature usually has a greater influence on forage quality than other environmental factors encountered by plants. Within a region or area, the primary effect of temperature on forage quality is to determine the rate of plant development and to influence the relative proportions of leaves and stems. In early work at Wageningen, the Netherlands, B. Deinum et al. investigated the relative effects of temperature, solar radiation, and N nutrition on ryegrass digestibility under field conditions. The capacity of forages to sustain a positive or constant turgor as water potentials decrease is an important adaptation to water deficits. Shading has both direct and indirect effects on forage quality in that it can alter the chemical composition of forages and alter morphological development and yield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant
Van Soest, P. J. (1994) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501732355 · Cited by 7,312
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826
Lyons, J. M. (1973) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002305 · Cited by 1,428
Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Disease Resistance
Nicholson, R. L., & Hammerschmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002101 · Cited by 1,400
Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress
Turner, N. C., & Kramer, P. J. (1980) · Cited by 1,333
(1990) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-498310-6.x5001-9 · Cited by 1,326
Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility
(1993) · ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books · doi:10.2134/1993.foragecellwall · Cited by 1,212
Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America
Teeri, J. A., & Stowe, L. G. (1976) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00351210 · Cited by 749
Plants and the daylight spectrum.
Smith, H. (1981) · Cited by 744
Microclimate—The Biological Environment
SHULMAN, M. D. (1984) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-198409000-00012 · Cited by 736
Cited by
Silage review: Unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions
Bernardes, T. F., Daniel, J. L. P., Adesogan, A. T., McAllister, T. A., Drouin, P., Nussio, L. G., Huhtanen, P., Tremblay, G. F., Bélanger, G., & Cai, Y. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13703 · Cited by 252
Forage quality of native warm-season grasses in response to nitrogen fertilization and harvest date
Waramit, N., Moore, K. J., & Fales, S. L. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.02.008 · Cited by 44
Self-citationYield and quality analyses of bioenergy crops grown on a regulatory brownfield
Smith, S. L., Thelen, K. D., & MacDonald, S. J. (2013) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.017 · Cited by 43
Plant biodiversity of mountain grasslands as influenced by dairy farm management in the Eastern Alps
Pornaro, C., Spigarelli, C., Pasut, D., Ramanzin, M., Bovolenta, S., Sturaro, E., & Macolino, S. (2021) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107583 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Buxton, D. R., & Fales, S. L.
- Venue
- ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06
- Pages
- 155-199
- ISSN
- 2691-2341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2499465395
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 54
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Environment and Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/1994.foragequality.c4
- The paper
- Buxton, D. R., & Fales, S. L. (1994). Plant Environment and Quality. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books. https://doi.org/10.2134/1994.foragequality.c4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
