Cited by 55Bioenergy crop production and managementPasture and Agricultural SystemsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Switchgrass and big bluestem responses to amendments on strongly acid soil

Jung, G. A., Shaffer, J. A., Stout, W. L.·1988·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Abstract Native perennial warm‐season grasses are established and used in the northeastern United States for beef cattle (Bos taurus) production, wildlife habitat, and soil conservation. This research was conducted in Pennsylvania to study select plant growth responses and forage quality of switchgrass (SWG), Panicum virgatum L., and big bluestem (BBS), Andropogon gerardii Vitman, to dolomitic lime, and P and N fertilizers on strongly acid, fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic, Typic Fragiaqualfs. The soil amendments were applied after the first growing season. Growth of SWG and BBS was markedly improved by topdressings of lime and N fertilizer. In 1981 and 1982, untreated warm‐season grass yielded approximately 50%, and grass receiving the low rate of applied nutrients yielded 90%, of that with the high lime and fertilizer rate (8.76 Mg ha−1). Nitrogen fertilizer increased production of stems and leaf sheaths more than leaf laminae. Crude protein concentration (CPC) of both species generally was low, but N fertilizer increased CPC from 52 to 77 g kg−1. In vitro dry matter disappearance values were low, but significant species X N, lime X N, species X lime X N, and N X year interactions occurred. Lime effects were significant for concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Mn; P fertilizer for Ca, Mg, and P; and N fertilizer for Ca, Mg, P, and Mn. Aluminum concentrations in forage were low even with an exchangeable soil Al of 100 kg ha−1. Approximately 80% of the root mass of each species was within the top 10 cm of soil, but roots were observed growing along prism faces of the fragipan at 60 cm. The warm‐season grasses were productive on strongly acid (31 Mg lime ha−1 needed for neutralization), infertile soil, with low inputs of lime (4.5 Mg ha−1) and fertilizer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000040023x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has shown application rates of 10-40 kg P ha-1 did not affect switchgrass yield for upland or lowland ecotypes.

    “Previous research has shown application rates of 10-40 kg P ha À1 did not affect switchgrass yield for upland or lowland ecotypes (Jung et al., 1988;Muir et al., 2001).”

    From Field-scale soil property changes under switchgrass managed for bioenergy (2011) · cites this paper as Jung et al., 1988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jung, G. A., Shaffer, J. A., & Stout, W. L.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Jung, G. A.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-07
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
669-676
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2028645991
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
switchgrass, big bluestem, Andropogon gerardii, soil amendment, dolomitic lime, nitrogen fertilization, phosphorus fertilizer, forage quality, crude protein, in vitro dry matter disappearance, root distribution, fragipan, soil fertility, warm-season grasses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review