The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In‐Season Prediction of Potential Grain Yield in Winter Wheat Using Canopy Reflectance
Abstract
Nitrogen fertilization rates in cereal production systems are generally determined by subtracting soil test N from a specified N requirement based on the grain yield goal, which represents the best achievable grain yield in the last 4 to 5 yr. If grain yield could be predicted in season, topdress N rates could be adjusted based on projected N removal. Our study was conducted to determine if the potential grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) could be predicted using in‐season spectral measurements collected between January and March. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was determined from reflectance measurements under daytime lighting in the red and near‐infrared (NIR) regions of the spectra. In‐season estimated yield (EY) was computed using the sum of two postdormancy NDVI measurements (Jan. and Mar.) divided by the cumulative growing degree days (GDD) from the first to second reading. A significant relationship between grain yield and EY was observed when combining all nine locations across a 2‐yr period. Our estimates of potential grain yield (made in early Mar.) differed from measured grain yield (mid‐July) at three sites where yield‐altering factors (e.g., late summer rains delayed harvest and increased grain yield loss due to lodging and shattering) were encountered after the final sensing. Evaluating data from six of the nine locations across a 2‐yr period, EY values explained 83% of the variability in measured grain yield. Use of EY may assist in refining in‐season application of fertilizer N based on predicted potential grain yield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategies to Make Use of Plant Sensors‐Based Diagnostic Information for Nitrogen Recommendations
Samborski, S. M., Tremblay, N., & Fallon, E. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0162rx · Cited by 344
A Review of Methods to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Agriculture
Sharma, L., & Bali, S. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010051 · Cited by 319
Dynamic monitoring of NDVI in wheat agronomy and breeding trials using an unmanned aerial vehicle
Duan, T., Chapman, S. C., Guo, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.025 · Cited by 282
Babar, M. A., Reynolds, M. P., van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A. R., Raun, W. R., & Stone, M. L. (2006) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0211 · Cited by 275
Self-citationBeres, B. L., Hatfield, J. L., Kirkegaard, J. A., Eigenbrode, S. D., Pan, W. L., Lollato, R. P., Hunt, J. R., Strydhorst, S., Porker, K., Lyon, D., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00828 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Raun, W. R., Solie, J. B., Johnson, G. V., Stone, M. L., Lukina, E. V., Thomason, W. E., & Schepers, J. S.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-138
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2004675407
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In‐Season Prediction of Potential Grain Yield in Winter Wheat Using Canopy Reflectance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2001.931131x
- The paper
- Raun, W. R., Solie, J. B., Johnson, G. V., Stone, M. L., Lukina, E. V., Thomason, W. E., & Schepers, J. S. (2001). In‐Season Prediction of Potential Grain Yield in Winter Wheat Using Canopy Reflectance. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.931131x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.