The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management
Abstract
Soil quality concepts are commonly used to evaluate sustainable land management in agroecosystems. The objectives of this review were to trace the importance of soil organic matter (SOM) in Canadian sustainable land management studies and illustrate the role of SOM and aggregation in sustaining soil functions. Canadian studies on soil quality were initiated in the early 1980s and showed that loss of SOM and soil aggregate stability were standard features of nonsustainable land use. Subsequent studies have evaluated SOM quality using the following logical sequence: soil purpose and function, processes, properties and indicators, and methodology. Limiting steps in this soil quality framework are the questions of critical limits and standardization for soil properties. At present, critical limits for SOM are selected using a commonly accepted reference value or based on empirically derived relations between SOM and a specific soil process or function (e.g., soil fertility, productivity, or erodibility). Organic matter fractions (e.g., macro-organic matter, light fraction, microbial biomass, and mineralizable C) describe the quality of SOM. These fractions have biological significance for several soil functions and processes and are sensitive indicators of changes in total SOM. Total SOM influences soil compactibility, friability, and soil water-holding capacity while aggregated SOM has major implications for the functioning of soil in regulating air and water infiltration, conserving nutrients, and influencing soil permeability and erodibility. Overall, organic matter inputs, the dynamics of the sand-sized macro-organic matter, and the soil aggregation process are important factors in maintaining and regulating organic matter functioning in soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defining and Assessing Soil Quality
Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c1 · Cited by 2,176
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss95-075 · Cited by 1,686
Physical control of soil organic matter dynamics in the tropics
Feller, C., & Beare, M. H. (1997) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00039-6 · Cited by 925
Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems
Arshad, M. A., & Martin, S. (2002) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00252-3 · Cited by 660
The changing concept of soil quality
Warkentin, B. P. (1995) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1995.12456954 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
Lal, R. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032 · Cited by 3,936
Soil compaction in cropping systems
Hamza, M. A., & Anderson, W. K. (2005) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009 · Cited by 1,889
World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel
Lal, R. (2005) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005 · Cited by 1,004
Fließbach, A., Oberholzer, H.-R., Gunst, L., & Mäder, P. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.022 · Cited by 745
Global Potential of Soil Carbon Sequestration to Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect
Lal, R. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713610854 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, M. R.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W4254420749
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2002.0038
- The paper
- Carter, M. R. (2002). Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.