Cited by 1,010Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Nitrogen Management Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Tile‐Drained Midwestern Soils

Dinnes, Dana L., Karlen, Douglas L., Jaynes, Dan B., Kaspar, Thomas C., Hatfield, Jerry L., Colvin, Thomas S., Cambardella, Cynthia A.·2002·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Balancing the amount of N needed for optimum plant growth while minimizing the NO3 that is transported to ground and surface waters remains a major challenge for everyone attempting to understand and improve agricultural nutrient use efficiency. Our objectives for this review are to examine how changes in agricultural management practices during the past century have affected N in midwestern soils and to identify the types of research and management practices needed to reduce the potential for nonpoint NO3 leakage into water resources. Inherent soil characteristics and management practices contributing to nonpoint NO3 loss from midwestern soils, the impact of NO3 loading on surface water quality, improved N management strategies, and research needs are discussed. Artificial drainage systems can have a significant impact on water quality because they behave like shallow, direct conduits to surface waters. Nonpoint loss of NO3 from fields to water resources, however, is not caused by any single factor. Rather, it is caused by a combination of factors, including tillage, drainage, crop selection, soil organic matter levels, hydrology, and temperature and precipitation patterns. Strategies for reducing NO3 loss through drainage include improved timing of N application at appropriate rates, using soil tests and plant monitoring, diversifying crop rotations, using cover crops, reducing tillage, optimizing N application techniques, and using nitrification inhibitors. Nitrate can als…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2002.1530

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water table management is only economically feasible on fields that have a 1% slope or less.

    “Water table management is only economically feasible on fields that have a 1% slope or less (Dinnes et al., 2002).”

    From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Dinnes et al., 2002

  • Drainage systems are typically shallow, direct pipelines to surface waters, discharging high nutrient water directly to streams and downstream ecosystems.

    “Drainage systems are typically shallow, direct pipelines to surface waters, discharging high nutrient water directly to streams and downstream ecosystems (Dinnes et al., 2002).”

    From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Dinnes et al., 2002

  • The rate and time of N fertilizer application are critical components of N fertilizer management.

    “The rate and time of N fertilizer application are critical components of N fertilizer management (Dinnes et al. 2002) and followed standard recommendations in this study.”

    From LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS (2007) · cites this paper as Dinnes et al. 2002

  • Soil NO3 concentrations tend to be higher under conventional tillage but the volume of water flowing through the soil tends to be higher under no-till, leading to variable results on the effect of tillage on NO3 leaching.

    “Soil NO3 concentrations tend to be higher under conventional tillage but the volume of water flowing through the soil tends to be higher under no-till, leading to variable results on the effect of tillage on NO3 leaching (Dinnes et al. 2002).”

    From LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS (2007) · cites this paper as Dinnes et al. 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinnes, D. L., Karlen, D. L., Jaynes, D. B., Kaspar, T. C., Hatfield, J. L., Colvin, T. S., & Cambardella, C. A.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Dinnes, Dana L.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
153-171
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2023720317
Cited by
1,010
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 46
FWCI
17.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
nitrogen management, nitrate leaching, tile drainage, non-point source pollution, surface water quality, nitrogen application timing, soil analysis, crop rotation diversification, cover crops, reduced tillage, nitrification inhibitors, constructed wetlands, biofilter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review