The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory and Practical Application of Heat Pulse to Measure Sap Flow
Abstract
Heat pulse methods can be used for accurate measurements of sap flow in plant stems provided a reliable calibration procedure is used to relate the measured heat pulse velocity to the actual sap flow. This paper reviews the theory underpinning both the compensation and T‐max heat pulse methods that use a linear heater and temperature probes inserted radially into the plant stem. These probes not only disrupt the sap stream, but they also alter the thermal homogeneity of the sapwood in the vicinity of the probes. The degree of disturbance depends on the size and geometry of the probes and the corresponding wound width of the nonconducting sapwood. A two‐dimensional model of heat and water flow was used here to derive appropriate correction factors to account for the influence of both probe thermal properties and flow blockage. Wound width has a large influence on the heat pulse measurements while sensor material appears to have little or no influence. A table of correction factors is presented for both the compensation and T‐max methods. These new correction factors are confirmed by comparing heat pulse measurements in the trunk of a willow (Salix alba L.) and a poplar (Populus deltoides W. Bartram ex Marsh), against actual rates of transpiration determined from measured weight loss of the trees growing in large lysimeters. On a daily basis, both heat pulse measurements were found to be within 5 to 10% of the actual transpiration. The compensation method accurately measured flows close to 2 cm/h. The T‐max method had difficulty resolving any flows slower than about 10 cm/h.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Cited by
Sulman, B. N., Roman, D. T., Yi, K., Wang, L., Phillips, R. P., & Novick, K. A. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2016gl069416 · Cited by 309
Changes in evapotranspiration following wildfire in resprouting eucalypt forests
Nolan, R. H., Lane, P. N. J., Benyon, R. G., Bradstock, R. A., & Mitchell, P. J. (2014) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1002/eco.1463 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, S., Clothier, B., & Jardine, B.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1371-1379
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W1964494895
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory and Practical Application of Heat Pulse to Measure Sap Flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2003.1371
- The paper
- Green, S., Clothier, B., & Jardine, B. (2003). Theory and Practical Application of Heat Pulse to Measure Sap Flow. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.