Evaluating Cover Crops for Benefits, Costs and Performance within Cropping System Niches
Abstract
The integration of cover crops into cropping systems brings costs and benefits, both internal and external to the farm. Benefits include promoting pest‐suppression, soil and water quality, nutrient cycling efficiency, and cash crop productivity. Costs of adopting cover crops include increased direct costs, potentially reduced income if cover crops interfere with other attractive crops, slow soil warming, difficulties in predicting N mineralization, and production expenses. Cover crop benefits tend to be higher in irrigated systems. The literature is reviewed here along with Michigan farmer experience to evaluate promising cover crop species for four niches: Northern winter (USDA Hardiness Zones 5–6), Northern summer (Zones 5–6), Southern winter (Zones 7–8), and Southern summer (Zones 7–8). Warm season C 4 grasses are outstanding performers for summer niches (6–9 Mg ha−1), and rye (Secale cereale L.) is the most promising for winter niches (0.8–6 Mg ha−1) across all hardiness zones reviewed. Legume–cereal mixtures such as sudangrass (Sorghum sudanese L.)–cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) are the most effective means to produce substantial amounts (28 Mg ha−1) of mixed quality residues. Legume covers are slow growers and expensive to establish. At the same time, legumes fix N, produce high quality but limited amounts (0.5–4 Mg ha−1) of residues, and enhance beneficial insect habitat. Brassica species produce glucosinolate‐containing residues (2–6 Mg ha−1) and suppress plant‐parasitic nematodes and soil‐borne disease. Legume cover crops are the most reliable means to enhance cash crop yields compared with fallows or other cover crop species. However, farmer goals and circumstances must be considered. If soil pests are a major yield limiting factor in cash crop production, then use of brassica cover crops should be considered. Cereal cover crops produce the largest amount of biomass and should be considered when the goal is to rapidly build soil organic matter. Legume–cereal or brassica–cereal mixtures show promise over a wide range of niches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cover crops can reduce nitrate leaching after cash crop harvest.
“Cover crops can reduce nitrate leaching after cash crop harvest.”
From Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching (2022) · cites this paper as Snapp et al., 2005
N released from cover crops terminated at the end of the leaching season may be available to the following cash crop.
“and may be available to the following cash crop (Snapp et al., 2005; White et al., 2017).”
From Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching (2022) · cites this paper as Snapp et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Cheng, K., Yue, Q., Chadwick, D., Espenberg, M., Truu, J., Rees, R. M., & Smith, P. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14644 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems
Schipanski, M. E., Barbercheck, M., Douglas, M. R., Finney, D. M., Haider, K., Kaye, J. P., Kemanian, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., Ryan, M. R., Tooker, J., et al. (2014) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.004 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Natural climate solutions for the United States
Fargione, J. E., Bassett, S., Boucher, T., Bridgham, S. D., Conant, R. T., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Falcucci, A., Fourqurean, J. W., Gopalakrishna, T., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat1869 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation
Lehman, R., Cambardella, C., Stott, D., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D., Buyer, J., Maul, J., Smith, J., Collins, H., Halvorson, J., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7010988 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Land-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon accumulation rates and Mechanisms
Grandy, A. S., & Robertson, G. P. (2007) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-006-9010-y · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Do diverse cover crop mixtures perform better than monocultures? A systematic review
Florence, A. M., & McGuire, A. M. (2020) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.1002/agj2.20340 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Jacobs, A. A., Evans, R. S., Allison, J. K., Garner, E. R., Kingery, W. L., & McCulley, R. L. (2022) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.105310 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Are cover crop mixtures better at suppressing weeds than cover crop monocultures?
Smith, R. G., Warren, N. D., & Cordeau, S. (2020) · Weed Science · doi:10.1017/wsc.2020.12 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Drakopoulos, D., Kägi, A., Six, J., Zorn, A., Wettstein, F. E., Bucheli, T. D., Forrer, H.-R., & Vogelgsang, S. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103198 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching
Sedghi, N., & Weil, R. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.1002/jeq2.20342 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Snapp, S. S., Swinton, S. M., Labarta, R., Mutch, D., Black, J. R., Leep, R., Nyiraneza, J., & O'Neil, K.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State Univ. East Lansing MI 48824
- Corresponding author
- Snapp, S. S.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 322-332
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W3009251631
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 25.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
- Keywords
- cover crops, hardiness zones, rye, warm-season grasses, C4 grasses, cereal-legume mixtures, brassica cover crops, glucosinolates, nematode suppression, soil organic matter, residue quality, pest suppression, cash crop yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review