Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Green Leaf Area Index Estimation in Maize and Soybean: Combining Vegetation Indices to Achieve Maximal Sensitivity

Nguy-Robertson, Anthony, Gitelson, Anatoly, Peng, Yi, Viña, Andrés, Arkebauer, Timothy, Rundquist, Donald·2012·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Vegetation indices (VIs), traditionally used for estimation of green leaf area index (gLAI), have different sensitivities along the range of gLAI variability. The goals of this study were to: (i) test 12 VIs for estimating gLAI in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]; (ii) estimate gLAI in both crops without the need to reparameterize the algorithms for different crops; and (iii) devise a combined VI that is maximally sensitive to gLAI along its entire range of variability. The study was performed for eight growing seasons (2001–2008) in one irrigated and one rainfed field under a maize–soybean rotation and one irrigated field under continuous maize in eastern Nebraska for a total of 24 field‐years. The gLAI ranged from 0 to 6.5 m 2/m 2 in maize and 0 to 5.5 m 2/m 2 in soybean. Normalized difference indices, e.g., the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were most sensitive to gLAI below 2 m 2/m 2, while ratio indices, e.g., simple ratio (SR) and chlorophyll indices (CIs), were most sensitive to gLAI above 2 m 2/m 2. For the crops evaluated, relationships between gLAI and the VIs were species specific with the exception of the red‐edge NDVI and the CI red‐edge. To benefit from the different sensitivities of VIs along the entire gLAI range, we suggest combining VIs. For sensors with spectral bands in the red and near‐infrared regions, the best combination was NDVI and SR (maize: coefficient of variation [CV] = 20%; soybean: CV = 23%); however, this combined index is species specific. For sensors with bands in the red‐edge and near‐infrared regions, the best combination was red‐edge NDVI and CI red‐edge, which was capable of accurately estimating gLAI in both crops with a CV < 20% and with no reparameterization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2012.0065

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Nguy-Robertson, A., Gitelson, A., Peng, Y., Viña, A., Arkebauer, T., & Rundquist, D.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
1336-1347
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W1987997875
Cited by
292
References
1
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green Leaf Area Index Estimation in Maize and Soybean: Combining Vegetation Indices to Achieve Maximal Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2012.0065
The paper
Nguy-Robertson, A., Gitelson, A., Peng, Y., Viña, A., Arkebauer, T., & Rundquist, D. (2012). Green Leaf Area Index Estimation in Maize and Soybean: Combining Vegetation Indices to Achieve Maximal Sensitivity. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0065

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.