The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutrient Uptake, Partitioning, and Remobilization in Modern, Transgenic Insect‐Protected Maize Hybrids
Open accessAbstract
Modern maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids coupled with improved agronomic practices may have influenced the accumulation and partitioning of nutrient uptake since the last comprehensive studies were published. The objective of this study was to investigate nutrient uptake and partitioning among elite commercial germplasm with transgenic insect protection grown under modern management practices. Plants were sampled at six growth stages and divided into four fractions for nutrient determination. Total nutrients required per hectare to produce 23.0 Mg ha−1 of total biomass with 12.0 Mg ha−1 of grain included 286 kg N, 114 kg P 2 O 5, 202 kg K 2 O, 59 kg Mg, 26 kg S, 1.4 kg Fe, 0.5 kg Mn, 0.5 kg Zn, 0.1 kg Cu, and 0.08 kg B. A 10‐d period (V10–V14) denoted the maximum rates of accumulation on a per day basis for dry weight (439 kg), N (8.9 kg), P 2 O 5 (2.4 kg), K 2 O (5.8 kg), Mg (2.2 kg), S (0.7 kg), Zn (14.2 g), Mn (18.0 g), B (3.3 g), Fe (95.3 g), and Cu (3.0 g). The majority of total uptake occurred post‐flowering for P, S, Zn, and Cu. Harvest index values of P (79%), S (57%), Zn (62%), and N (58%) were identified in the grain. These results provide much needed data on the nutrient uptake and partitioning of current hybrids, and provide an opportunity to further refine fertilizer method and timing recommendations for maize biomass and grain production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Official Methods of Analysis of
(1980) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50052a726 · Cited by 59,330
Hanway, J. J. (1966) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 1,925
Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize
Tollenaar, M., & Lee, E. A. (2002) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(02)00024-2 · Cited by 717
Micronutrient Nutrition of Plants
Welch, R. M., & Shuman, L. (1995) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689509701922 · Cited by 715
Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology.
HAY, R. K. M. (1995) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb05015.x · Cited by 686
Vicente-Carbajosa, J., Moose, S. P., Parsons, R. L., & Schmidt, R. J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.14.7685 · Cited by 427
Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation.
Sinclair, T. R. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800030002x · Cited by 412
Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize
Duvick, D. N. (1992) · Maydica · Cited by 259
Vaughn, T., Cavato, T., Brar, G., Coombe, T., DeGooyer, T., Ford, S., Groth, M., Howe, A., Johnson, S., Kolacz, K., et al. (2005) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0304 · Cited by 242
Progress in Breeding Low Phytate Crops
Raboy, V. (2002) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/132.3.503s · Cited by 231
Cited by
Rowe, H., Withers, P. J. A., Baas, P., Chan, N. I., Doody, D., Holiman, J., Jacobs, B., Li, H., MacDonald, G. K., McDowell, R., et al. (2016) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-015-9726-1 · Cited by 293
Corn Nitrogen Management Following Daikon Radish and Forage Oat Cover Crops
Rutan, J., & Steinke, K. (2019) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2018.07.0269 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, R. R., Haegele, J. W., Ruffo, M. L., & Below, F. E.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-170
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2025652299
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 27.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Uptake, Partitioning, and Remobilization in Modern, Transgenic Insect‐Protected Maize Hybrids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2012.0352
- The paper
- Bender, R. R., Haegele, J. W., Ruffo, M. L., & Below, F. E. (2013). Nutrient Uptake, Partitioning, and Remobilization in Modern, Transgenic Insect‐Protected Maize Hybrids. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.