Cited by 31Genetics and Plant BreedingBioenergy crop production and managementCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Eleven Industrial Hemp Cultivars Grown in Eastern Canada

Aubin, Marie‐Pier, Seguin, Philippe, Vanasse, Anne, Lalonde, Olivier, Tremblay, Gaëtan F., Mustafa, Arif F., Charron, Jean‐Benoit·2016·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is a multipurpose crop for which there is growing interest in Canada. There is, however, currently limited information on the adaptation and production potential of government approved cultivars in eastern Canada. Eleven cultivars were evaluated in terms of biomass and seed yields and composition, when grown in seven contrasted environments in the province of Québec. Dry matter yields varied considerably across cultivars and environments, ranging between 172 and 8837 kg ha–¹ (average of 3226 kg ha–¹) for biomass, and between 47 and 3781 kg ha–¹ (average of 1315 kg ha–¹) for seeds. Despite the presence of cultivar × environment interactions for both biomass and seed yields, the cultivars Anka, Ferimon, and Jutta consistently produced high yields across environments. Averaged across environments, these cultivars respectively had biomass and seed yields of 4591 and 1397, 5827, and 1878, and 4096 and 1408 kg DM ha–¹. Limited variation was observed among cultivars in terms of composition. Cellulose was the largest biomass constituent (average of 562 g kg–¹ DM across cultivars and environments), followed by hemicellulose and lignin (averages of 123 and 93 g kg–¹ DM, respectively), while seed crude protein (CP) and oil (ether extract) concentrations averaged 237 and 288 g kg–¹ DM, respectively. Considerable variation in yield potential and adaptation were observed among the cultivars of industrial hemp evaluated in the province of Québec; while b…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2016.04.0217

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, 2015, Industrial hemp enterprise
  2. 10.1080/15377880801898691 · DOI
  3. AOAC, 2004, Rapid determination of oil/fat utilizing high temperature solvent extraction
  4. Aubin M.‐P., 2015, Industrial hemp response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization, Crop, Forage, and Turfgrass Manag., 2015, 1, 10.2134/cftm2015.0159 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baxter W.J., 2000, Growing industrial hemp in Ontario
  6. Blade S.F., 2006, Fatty acid and tocopherol profiles of industrial hemp cultivars grown in the high latitude prairie region of Canada, J. Ind. Hemp, 10, 33, 10.1300/J237v10n02_04 · DOI
  7. Bócsa I., 1998, The cultivation of hemp: Botany, varieties, cultivation and harvesting
  8. Brown D.M., 1993, Crop heat units for corn and other warm‐season crops in Ontario
  9. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.017 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.006 · DOI
  11. 10.4141/cjps78-157 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/jf102636b · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lisson S.N., 2000, Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 2. The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 40, 413, 10.1071/EA99059 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1752-153X-6-122 · DOI
  16. Mihoc M., 2013, Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Agricultural Engineering, Opatija, Croatia. 19–22 Feb. 2013, 374
  17. SAS Institute, 2008, SAS/STAT user's guide. V.9.2
  18. 10.1002/jsfa.1825 · DOI
  19. Slaski J.J., 2015, Industrial hemp: It is not as hard as it looks
  20. 10.1007/s12229-015-9157-3 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s10681-004-4753-z · DOI
  22. Vera C.L., 2010, N, P and S fertilization effects on industrial hemp in Saskatchewan, Can. J. Plant Sci., 90, 179, 10.4141/CJPS09101 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1996.tb05736.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aubin, M., Seguin, P., Vanasse, A., Lalonde, O., Tremblay, G. F., Mustafa, A. F., & Charron, J.
Affiliations
  • Collège MacDonald (CA)
  • Dep. of Plant Science Macdonald Campus of McGill University Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue QC H9X3V9 Canada
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Grain Research Centre (CA)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
108
Issue
5
Pages
1972-1980
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2506037720
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
industrial hemp, Cannabis sativa, cultivar evaluation, biomass yield, seed yield, seed chemical composition, cultivar × environment interaction, eastern Canada, Quebec, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, crude protein, seed oil, crop adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review