The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavior and Transport of Microbial Pathogens and Indicator Organisms in Soils Treated with Organic Wastes
Abstract
In a critical review of pathogen and indicator‐organism transformations and transport from land areas receiving organic wastes, microbial die‐off was described assuming first‐order kinetics. First‐order die‐off rate constants (k) were calculated from the literature data for various pathogens and indicator organisms. For indicator organisms average die‐off rates were 1.14 day−1 (0.08–9.1) for fecal coliforms, and 0.41 day−1 (0.05–3.87 day−1) for fecal streptococci. For pathogens, the average die‐off rates were 1.33 day−1 (0.21–6.93) for Salmonella, 0.68 day−1 (0.62–0.74 day–1) for Shigella sp., and 1.45 day−1 (0.04–3.69 day−1) for viruses, respectively. Die‐off rates increased approximately two times with a 10°C rise in temperature (5–30°C). Microbial die‐off increased with decrease in soil moisture and was minimum in a pH range of 6–7. Correction factors were presented to adjust the k values for the changes in temperature, moisture, and pH. Retention of pathogens and indicator organisms by soil particles was described assuming a linear isotherm. Retention of microorganisms increased with an increase in clay content of the soil. Major transport processes reviewed were leaching and surface runoff for land areas receiving animal wastes, and pastures and rangeland watersheds where animals distribute waste directly on the land. Some of the important research needs identified include (i) mechanisms involved in the retention of bacteria and viruses by the soil; (ii) measurement of retention coefficients for some important pathogens and indicator organisms, as a function of physico‐chemical properties of soil; (iii) processes involved in the transport of bacteria and viruses along with the percolating water or in runoff water; and (iv) extensive testing of available models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 616
Poultry Waste Management: Agricultural and Environmental Issues
Sims, J. T., & Wolf, D. C. (1994) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60621-5 · Cited by 411
Wilkes, G., Edge, T., Gannon, V., Jokinen, C., Lyautey, E., Medeiros, D., Neumann, N., Ruecker, N., Topp, E., & Lapen, D. R. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.033 · Cited by 332
Assessing microbial pollution of rural surface waters
Jamieson, R., Gordon, R., Joy, D., & Lee, H. (2004) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2004.05.006 · Cited by 266
Leifert, C., Ball, K., Volakakis, N., & Cooper, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03794.x · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, K. R., Khaleel, R., & Overcash, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-266
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2060876962
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavior and Transport of Microbial Pathogens and Indicator Organisms in Soils Treated with Organic Wastes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq1981.00472425001000030001x
- The paper
- Reddy, K. R., Khaleel, R., & Overcash, M. R. (1981). Behavior and Transport of Microbial Pathogens and Indicator Organisms in Soils Treated with Organic Wastes. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1981.00472425001000030001x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.