Cited by 164Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gaseous Nitrogen Losses from Soils Under Zero‐Till as Compared with Conventional‐Till Management Systems

Open access
Aulakh, M. S., Rennie, D. A., Paul, E. A.·1984·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

The gaseous losses of N from conventional‐till (CT) and zero‐till (ZT) crop fields were 3 to 7 and 12 to 16 kg N ha−1 y−1, respectively. In contrast, losses from CT and ZT fallow were severalfold higher, namely, 12 to 14 and 34 kg N ha−1, respectively. The more dense surface soil and consistently higher moisture content (lower air‐filled porosity) were identified as major factors affecting increased denitrification under ZT. The potential denitrification rates were markedly higher under ZT, and the population of denitrifiers was up to six times higher than in CT soil samples. The contribution of lower soil horizons towards gaseous N losses was found to be low on both CT and ZT fields, and this finding was confirmed from a survey carried out on three other widely differing soils. Volumetric soil moisture and air temperature were the only two of several factors that accounted for a significant portion of the variations in gaseous N fluxes under field conditions. The average mole fraction of N 2 O ranged from almost 100% to as low as 28% of the total gaseous products and showed a negative relationship with soil moisture.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300010024x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–144 of 144

Metadata

Authors
Aulakh, M. S., Rennie, D. A., & Paul, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
130-136
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W1983639362
Cited by
164
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
nitrogen loss, no-tillage, conventional tillage, denitrification, nitrous oxide, soil moisture, air-filled porosity, soil compaction, denitrifying bacteria, fallow, soil management systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review