Cited by 46Groundwater flow and contamination studiesSoil and Unsaturated FlowEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparison of Sorption Equilibrium Distribution Coefficients Using Batch and Centrifugation Methods

Celorie, J. A., Woods, S. L., Vinson, T. S., Istok, J. D.·1989·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Abstract Sorption equilibrium distribution coefficients, Kd's, are often used in solute transport models to predict the movement of hazardous wastes in soils. Kd values can be determined in the laboratory by performing batch equilibrium tests or column studies. However, these tests suffer from disadvantages. Batch tests may overestimate sorption in natural soils due to the solids effect, and column studies conducted with fine‐grained soils require a long time to conduct. Centrifugation testing can alleviate these disadvantages by testing a soil column instead of a soil suspension, by imposing a confining stress on the soil, and by producing a greater pore water velocity. Centrifuge experiments were conducted on a kaolinite/phenol system using a constant head permeameter and a laboratory centrifuge. Kd values were estimated by modeling the generated breakthrough curves with a solute transport model. Kd values obtained in the centrifuge experiments were compared with Kd values measured in batch equilibrium tests. Although the Kd values determined in the centrifuge were slightly lower than the values predicted by extrapolating the batch data, the results were consistent with the solids effect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800030012x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Celorie, J. A., Woods, S. L., Vinson, T. S., & Istok, J. D.
Affiliations
  • CH2M (United States) (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-07
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
307-313
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W1970435483
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • General Electric
  • Oregon State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
centrifuge testing, kaolinite, phenols, breakthrough curves, solute transport modeling, soil column experiments, pore water velocity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review