The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fractionation and Mobility of Copper, Lead, and Zinc in Soil Profiles in the Vicinity of a Copper Smelter
Abstract
Four soil profiles located near a copper smelter in Poland were investigated for the distribution and chemical fractions of Cu, Pb, and Zn and their mobility in relation to soil properties. Contamination with heavy metals was primarily restricted to surface horizons and the extent of contamination was 7‐ to 115‐fold for Cu, 30‐fold for Pb, and 6‐fold for Zn as compared with subsurface horizons. In the less‐contaminated fine‐textured soil, the metals were distributed in the order: residual >> Fe–Mn oxides occluded > organically complexed > exchangeable and specifically adsorbed, while the order for sandy soils was: residual > organically complexed > Fe–Mn oxides occluded > exchangeable and specifically adsorbed. The contaminated surface horizons of these profiles showed no consistent pattern of metal distribution. However, the common features of highly contaminated soils were very low percentage of residual fraction and the dominance of the NH 4 OAc extractable fraction. The sum of mobile metal fractions was generally <10% in subsurface horizons, while in the contaminated surface horizons these fractions made up 50% of the total metal contents. Soil properties contributed more to the relative distribution of the metal fractions in the studied profiles than did the distance and direction to the source of pollution. The amounts of metal extracted by 0.01 M CaCl 2 accounted for only a small part of the same metals extracted by NH 4 OAc. The mobility indexes of metals correlated positively and significantly with the total content of metals and negatively with the clay content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Cited by
Islam, M. S., Ahmed, M. K., Raknuzzaman, M., Habibullah -Al- Mamun, M., & Islam, M. K. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.016 · Cited by 1,454
Heavy metals contamination in water and sediments of an urban river in a developing country
Mohiuddin, K. M., Ogawa, Y., Zakir, H. M., Otomo, K., & Shikazono, N. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1007/bf03326257 · Cited by 272
Liu, G., Yu, Y., Hou, J., Xue, W., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Wang, W., Alsaedi, A., Hayat, T., & Liu, Z. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.040 · Cited by 254
Zhu, N.-M., Qiang-Li, Guo, X.-J., Hui-Zhang, & Yu-Deng (2014) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.12.033 · Cited by 104
Kocoń, A., & Jurga, B. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-8241-5 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Kabala, C., & Singh, B. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 485-492
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2161648098
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractionation and Mobility of Copper, Lead, and Zinc in Soil Profiles in the Vicinity of a Copper Smelter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2001.302485x
- The paper
- Kabala, C., & Singh, B. R. (2001). Fractionation and Mobility of Copper, Lead, and Zinc in Soil Profiles in the Vicinity of a Copper Smelter. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302485x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.