The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil‐to‐Root Transfer and Translocation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Vegetables Grown on Industrial Contaminated Soils
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are possible contaminants in some former industrial sites, representing a potential risk to human health if these sites are converted to residential areas. This work was conducted to determine whether PAHs present in contaminated soils are transferred to edible parts of selected vegetables. Soils were sampled from a former gasworks and a private garden, exhibiting a range of PAH concentrations (4 to 53 to 172 to 1263 and 2526 mg PAHs kg−1 of dry soil), and pot experiments were conducted in a greenhouse with lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Reine de Mai), potato (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Belle de Fontenay), and carrot (Daucus carota L. var. Nantaise). At harvest, above‐ and belowground biomass were determined and the PAH concentrations in soil were measured. In parallel, plates were placed in the greenhouse to estimate the average PAH‐dust deposition. Results showed that the presence of PAHs in soils had no detrimental effect on plant growth. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were detected in all plants grown in contaminated soils. However, their concentration was low compared with the initial soil concentration, and the bioconcentration factors were low (i.e., ranging from 13.4 × 10−4 in potato and carrot pulp to 2 × 10−2 in potato and carrot leaves). Except in peeled potatoes, the PAH concentration in vegetables increased with the PAH concentration in soils. The PAH distribution profiles in plant tissues and in soils suggested that root uptake was the main pathway for high molecular weight PAHs. On the opposite, lower molecular weight PAHs were probably taken up from the atmosphere through the leaves as well as by roots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Monitoring of environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review
Srogi, K. (2007) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-007-0095-0 · Cited by 986
Benzo[a]pyrene—Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Mechanisms of Toxicity
Bukowska, B., Mokra, K., & Michałowicz, J. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23116348 · Cited by 470
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Critical Review of Environmental Occurrence and Bioremediation
Alegbeleye, O. O., Opeolu, B. O., & Jackson, V. A. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0896-2 · Cited by 448
Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics
Abhilash, P. C., Jamil, S., & Singh, N. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.002 · Cited by 353
Uptake of Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids by Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)
Felizeter, S., McLachlan, M. S., & de Voogt, P. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302398u · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Fismes, J., Perrin‐Ganier, C., Empereur‐Bissonnet, P., & Morel, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1649-1656
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2040600747
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil‐to‐Root Transfer and Translocation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Vegetables Grown on Industrial Contaminated Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2002.1649
- The paper
- Fismes, J., Perrin‐Ganier, C., Empereur‐Bissonnet, P., & Morel, J. L. (2002). Soil‐to‐Root Transfer and Translocation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Vegetables Grown on Industrial Contaminated Soils. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.1649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.