The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application Technique and Slurry Co‐Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading: II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different application techniques on greenhouse gas emission from co‐fermented slurry. Ammonia (NH 3), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4) emissions were measured in two field experiments with four different application techniques on arable and grassland sites. To gather information about fermentation effects, unfermented slurry was also tested, but with trail hose application only. Co‐fermented slurry was applied in April at a rate of 30 m 3 ha−1 Measurements were made every 4 h on the first day after application and were continued for 6 wk with gradually decreasing sampling frequency. Methane emissions were <150 g C ha−1 from co‐fermentation products and seemed to result from dissolved CH 4 Only in the grassland experiment were emissions from unfermented slurry significantly higher, with wetter weather conditions probably promoting CH 4 production. Nitrous oxide emission was significantly increased by injection on arable and grassland sites two‐ and threefold, respectively. Ammonia emissions were smallest after injection or trail shoe application and are discussed in the preceding paper. We evaluated the climatic relevance of the measured gas emissions from the different application techniques based on the comparison of CO 2 equivalents. It was evident that NH 3 emission reduction, which can be achieved by injection, is at least compensated by increased N 2 O emissions. Our results indicate that on arable land, trail hose application with immediate shallow incorporation, and on grassland, trail shoe application, bear the smallest risks of high greenhouse gas emissions when fertilizing with co‐fermented slurry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nkoa, R. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z · Cited by 940
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry
Clemens, J., Trimborn, M., Weiland, P., & Amon, B. (2006) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016 · Cited by 438
Self-citationWalling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Manure-based biogas fermentation residues – friend or foe of soil fertility?
Insam, H., Gómez-Brandón, M., & Ascher, J. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006 · Cited by 321
Hou, Y., Velthof, G. L., & Oenema, O. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12767 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Wulf, S., Maeting, M., & Clemens, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1795-1801
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2412448359
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application Technique and Slurry Co‐Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading: II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2002.1795
- The paper
- Wulf, S., Maeting, M., & Clemens, J. (2002). Application Technique and Slurry Co‐Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading: II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.1795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.