Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Application Technique and Slurry Co‐Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading: II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Wulf, S., Maeting, M., Clemens, J.·2002·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different application techniques on greenhouse gas emission from co‐fermented slurry. Ammonia (NH 3), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4) emissions were measured in two field experiments with four different application techniques on arable and grassland sites. To gather information about fermentation effects, unfermented slurry was also tested, but with trail hose application only. Co‐fermented slurry was applied in April at a rate of 30 m 3 ha−1 Measurements were made every 4 h on the first day after application and were continued for 6 wk with gradually decreasing sampling frequency. Methane emissions were <150 g C ha−1 from co‐fermentation products and seemed to result from dissolved CH 4 Only in the grassland experiment were emissions from unfermented slurry significantly higher, with wetter weather conditions probably promoting CH 4 production. Nitrous oxide emission was significantly increased by injection on arable and grassland sites two‐ and threefold, respectively. Ammonia emissions were smallest after injection or trail shoe application and are discussed in the preceding paper. We evaluated the climatic relevance of the measured gas emissions from the different application techniques based on the comparison of CO 2 equivalents. It was evident that NH 3 emission reduction, which can be achieved by injection, is at least compensated by increased N 2 O emissions. Our results indicate that on arable land, trail hose application with immediate shallow incorporation, and on grassland, trail shoe application, bear the smallest risks of high greenhouse gas emissions when fertilizing with co‐fermented slurry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2002.1795

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Wulf, S., Maeting, M., & Clemens, J.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1795-1801
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2412448359
Cited by
221
References
0
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application Technique and Slurry Co‐Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading: II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2002.1795
The paper
Wulf, S., Maeting, M., & Clemens, J. (2002). Application Technique and Slurry Co‐Fermentation Effects on Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane Emissions after Spreading: II. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.1795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.