The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Trace Element Mobility in Contaminated Soils by Sequential Extraction
Abstract
The modified three‐step sequential extraction procedure proposed by the Community Bureau of Reference (or Bureau Communautaire de Référence, BCR) was used to predict trace element mobility in soils affected by an accidental spill comprising arsenopyrite‐ and heavy metal–enriched sludge particles and acid waste waters. The procedure was used to obtain the distribution of both the major (Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, and Mn) and trace elements (As, Bi, Cd, Cu, Pb, Tl, and Zn) in 13 soils of contrasting properties with various levels of contamination and in the sludge itself. The distributions of the major elements enabled us to confirm the main soil fractions solubilized in each of the three steps, and, in turn, to detect the presence of pyritic sludge particles by the high Fe extractability obtained in the third step. Cadmium was identified as being the most mobile of the elements, having the highest extractability in the first step, followed by Zn and Cu. Lead, Tl, Bi, and As were shown to be poorly mobile or nonmobile. In the case of some of the trace elements, the residual fractions decreased at higher levels of contamination, which was attributed to the anthropogenic contributions to the polluted samples. Comparison with soil–plant transfer factors, calculated in plants growing in the affected area, indicated that a relative sequence of trace element mobility was well predicted from data of the first step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Cited by
Islam, M. S., Ahmed, M. K., Raknuzzaman, M., Habibullah -Al- Mamun, M., & Islam, M. K. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.016 · Cited by 1,454
Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction?
Bacon, J. R., & Davidson, C. M. (2008) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b711896a · Cited by 649
Rao, C. R. M., Sahuquillo, A., & Lopez Sanchez, J. F. (2008) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9564-0 · Cited by 538
Pueyo, M., Mateu, J., Rigol, A., Vidal, M., López-Sánchez, J. F., & Rauret, G. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.020 · Cited by 422
Self-citationHeavy metals contamination in water and sediments of an urban river in a developing country
Mohiuddin, K. M., Ogawa, Y., Zakir, H. M., Otomo, K., & Shikazono, N. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1007/bf03326257 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Pueyo, M., Sastre, J., Hernández, E., Vidal, M., López‐Sánchez, J. F., & Rauret, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2054-2066
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W1984262204
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Trace Element Mobility in Contaminated Soils by Sequential Extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2003.2054
- The paper
- Pueyo, M., Sastre, J., Hernández, E., Vidal, M., López‐Sánchez, J. F., & Rauret, G. (2003). Prediction of Trace Element Mobility in Contaminated Soils by Sequential Extraction. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.2054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.