The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Phosphorus Leaching in Relation to Soil Type and Soil Phosphorus Content
Abstract
Phosphorus losses from arable soils contribute to eutrophication of freshwater systems. In addition to losses through surface runoff, leaching has lately gained increased attention as an important P transport pathway. Increased P levels in arable soils have highlighted the necessity of establishing a relationship between actual P leaching and soil P levels. In this study, we measured leaching of total phosphorus (TP) and dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) during three years in undisturbed soil columns of five soils. The soils were collected at sites, established between 1957 and 1966, included in a long-term Swedish fertility experiment with four P fertilization levels at each site. Total P losses varied between 0.03 and 1.09 kg ha(-1) yr(-1), but no general correlation could be found between P concentrations and soil test P (Olsen P and phosphorus content in ammonium lactate extract [P-AL]) or P sorption indices (single-point phosphorus sorption index [PSI] and P sorption saturation) of the topsoil. Instead, water transport mechanism through the soil and subsoil properties seemed to be more important for P leaching than soil test P value in the topsoil. In one soil, where preferential flow was the dominant water transport pathway, water and P bypassed the high sorption capacity of the subsoil, resulting in high losses. On the other hand, P leaching from some soils was low in spite of high P applications due to high P sorption capacity in the subsoil. Therefore, site-specific factors may serve as indicators for P leaching losses, but a single, general indicator for all soil types was not found in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
He, M., Xiong, X., Wang, L., Hou, D., Bolan, N. S., Ok, Y. S., Rinklebe, J., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125378 · Cited by 294
Saturation to Improve Pollutant Retention in a Rain Garden
Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051644f · Cited by 254
Contrasting effects of biochar on phosphorus dynamics and bioavailability in different soil types
Bornø, M. L., Müller-Stöver, D. S., & Liu, F. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.283 · Cited by 174
Phosphorus Fate, Management, and Modeling in Artificially Drained Systems
Kleinman, P. J. A., Smith, D. R., Bolster, C. H., & Easton, Z. M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2015.02.0090 · Cited by 106
Fertiliser strategies for improved nutrient use efficiency on sandy soils in high rainfall regimes
Sitthaphanit, S., Limpinuntana, V., Toomsan, B., Panchaban, S., & Bell, R. W. (2009) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-009-9253-z · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Djodjic, F., Börling, K., & Bergström, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 678-678
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093999397
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Leaching in Relation to Soil Type and Soil Phosphorus Content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2004.0678
- The paper
- Djodjic, F., Börling, K., & Bergström, L. (2004). Phosphorus Leaching in Relation to Soil Type and Soil Phosphorus Content. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.0678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.