Cited by 106Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Phosphorus Fate, Management, and Modeling in Artificially Drained Systems

Kleinman, Peter J. A., Smith, Douglas R., Bolster, Carl H., Easton, Zachary M.·2015·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) losses in agricultural drainage waters, both surface and subsurface, are among the most difficult form of nonpoint source pollution to mitigate. This special collection of papers on P in drainage waters documents the range of field conditions leading to P loss in drainage water, the potential for drainage and nutrient management practices to control drainage losses of P, and the ability of models to represent P loss to drainage systems. A review of P in tile drainage and case studies from North America, Europe, and New Zealand highlight the potential for artificial drainage to exacerbate watershed loads of dissolved and particulate P via rapid, bypass flow and shorter flow path distances. Trade-offs are identified in association with drainage intensification, tillage, cover crops, and manure management. While P in drainage waters tends to be tied to surface sources of P (soil, amendments or vegetation) that are in highest concentration, legacy sources of P may occur at deeper depths or other points along drainage flow paths. Most startling, none of the major fate-and-transport models used to predict management impacts on watershed P losses simulate the dominant processes of P loss to drainage waters. Because P losses to drainage waters can be so difficult to manage and to model, major investment are needed (i) in systems that can provide necessary drainage for agronomic production while detaining peak flows and promoting P retention and (ii) in models that can adequately describe P loss to drainage waters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0090

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practices such as dredging can destabilize banks and reduce P sorption capacity, resulting in ditches becoming a P source rather than sink.

    “For example, practices such as dredging can destabilize banks and reduce P sorption capacity, resulting in ditches becoming a P source rather than sink 148 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [148]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleinman, P. J. A., Smith, D. R., Bolster, C. H., & Easton, Z. M.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Kleinman, Peter J. A.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
460-466
ISSN
0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041828078
Cited by
106
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
phosphorus loss, agricultural drainage water, tile drainage, artificial drainage, non-point source pollution, phosphorus management, bypass flow, flow paths, legacy phosphorus, manure management, cover crops, tillage, phosphorus retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review