Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission and Carbon Content as Affected by Irrigation, Tillage, Cropping System, and Nitrogen Fertilization

Sainju, Upendra M., Jabro, Jalal D., Stevens, William B.·2008·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Management practices can influence soil CO 2 emission and C content in cropland, which can effect global warming. We examined the effects of combinations of irrigation, tillage, cropping systems, and N fertilization on soil CO 2 flux, temperature, water, and C content at the 0‐ to 20‐cm depth from May to November 2005 at two sites in the northern Great Plains. Treatments were two irrigation systems (irrigated vs. non‐irrigated) and six management practices that contained tilled and no‐tilled malt barley (Hordeum vulgaris L.) with 0 to 134 kg N ha−1, no‐tilled pea (Pisum sativum L.), and a conservation reserve program (CRP) planting applied in Lihen sandy loam (sandy, mixed, frigid, Entic Haplustolls) in western North Dakota. In eastern Montana, treatments were no‐tilled malt barley with 78 kg N ha−1, no‐tilled rye (Secale cereale L.), no‐tilled Austrian winter pea, no‐tilled fallow, and tilled fallow applied in dryland Williams loam (fine‐loamy, mixed Typic Argiborolls). Irrigation increased CO 2 flux by 13% compared with non‐irrigation by increasing soil water content in North Dakota. Tillage increased CO 2 flux by 62 to 118% compared with no‐tillage at both places. The flux was 1.5‐ to 2.5‐fold greater with tilled than with non‐tilled treatments following heavy rain or irrigation in North Dakota and 1.5‐ to 2.0‐fold greater with crops than with fallow following substantial rain in Montana. Nitrogen fertilization increased CO 2 flux by 14% compared with no N fertilization in North Dakota and cropping increased the flux by 79% compared with fallow in no‐till and 0 kg N ha−1 in Montana. The CO 2 flux in undisturbed CRP was similar to that in no‐tilled crops. Although soil C content was not altered, management practices influenced CO 2 flux within a short period due to changes in soil temperature, water, and nutrient contents. Regardless of irrigation, CO 2 flux can be reduced from croplands to a level similar to that in CRP planting using no‐tilled crops with or without N fertilization compared with other management practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2006.0392

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Sainju, U. M., Jabro, J. D., & Stevens, W. B.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
98-106
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2024002468
Cited by
254
References
29
FWCI
15.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission and Carbon Content as Affected by Irrigation, Tillage, Cropping System, and Nitrogen Fertilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2006.0392
The paper
Sainju, U. M., Jabro, J. D., & Stevens, W. B. (2008). Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission and Carbon Content as Affected by Irrigation, Tillage, Cropping System, and Nitrogen Fertilization. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0392

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.