Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn–Soybean Rotations

Al‐Kaisi, Mahdi M., Yin, Xinhua·2005·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Soil C change and CO 2 emission due to different tillage systems need to be evaluated to encourage the adoption of conservation practices to sustain soil productivity and protect the environment. We hypothesize that soil C storage and CO 2 emission respond to conservation tillage differently from conventional tillage because of their differential effects on soil properties. This study was conducted from 1998 through 2001 to evaluate tillage effects on soil C storage and CO 2 emission in Clarion–Nicollet–Webster soil association in a corn [Zea mays L.]–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation in Iowa. Treatments included no‐tillage with and without residue, strip‐tillage, deep rip, chisel plow, and moldboard plow. No‐tillage with residue and strip‐tillage significantly increased total soil organic C (TC) and mineral fraction C (MFC) at the 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm soil depths compared with chisel plow after 3 yr of tillage practices. Soil CO 2 emission was lower for less intensive tillage treatments compared with moldboard plow, with the greatest differences occurring immediately after tillage operations. Cumulative soil CO 2 emission was 19 to 41% lower for less intensive tillage treatments than moldboard plow, and it was 24% less for no‐tillage with residue than without residue during the 480‐h measurement period. Estimated soil mineralizable C pool was reduced by 22 to 66% with less intensive tillage treatments compared with moldboard plow. Adopting less intensive tillage systems such as no‐tillage, strip‐tillage, deep rip, and chisel plow and better crop residue cover are effective in reducing CO 2 emission and thus improving soil C sequestration in a corn–soybean rotation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2005.0437

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Al‐Kaisi, M. M., & Yin, X.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
437-445
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W1970489940
Cited by
417
References
2
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn–Soybean Rotations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2005.0437
The paper
Al‐Kaisi, M. M., & Yin, X. (2005). Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn–Soybean Rotations. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0437

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.