The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn–Soybean Rotations
Abstract
Soil C change and CO 2 emission due to different tillage systems need to be evaluated to encourage the adoption of conservation practices to sustain soil productivity and protect the environment. We hypothesize that soil C storage and CO 2 emission respond to conservation tillage differently from conventional tillage because of their differential effects on soil properties. This study was conducted from 1998 through 2001 to evaluate tillage effects on soil C storage and CO 2 emission in Clarion–Nicollet–Webster soil association in a corn [Zea mays L.]–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation in Iowa. Treatments included no‐tillage with and without residue, strip‐tillage, deep rip, chisel plow, and moldboard plow. No‐tillage with residue and strip‐tillage significantly increased total soil organic C (TC) and mineral fraction C (MFC) at the 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm soil depths compared with chisel plow after 3 yr of tillage practices. Soil CO 2 emission was lower for less intensive tillage treatments compared with moldboard plow, with the greatest differences occurring immediately after tillage operations. Cumulative soil CO 2 emission was 19 to 41% lower for less intensive tillage treatments than moldboard plow, and it was 24% less for no‐tillage with residue than without residue during the 480‐h measurement period. Estimated soil mineralizable C pool was reduced by 22 to 66% with less intensive tillage treatments compared with moldboard plow. Adopting less intensive tillage systems such as no‐tillage, strip‐tillage, deep rip, and chisel plow and better crop residue cover are effective in reducing CO 2 emission and thus improving soil C sequestration in a corn–soybean rotation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defining and Assessing Soil Quality
Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c1 · Cited by 2,176
Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen
Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen, M. M., & Long, J. H. (1990) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020026x · Cited by 652
Cited by
Ussiri, D. A. N., & Lal, R. (2009) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.11.008 · Cited by 324
Gál, A., Vyn, T. J., Michéli, E., Kladivko, E. J., & McFee, W. W. (2007) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2007.02.007 · Cited by 277
Sainju, U. M., Jabro, J. D., & Stevens, W. B. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0392 · Cited by 254
Soil management affects carbon dynamics and yield in a Mediterranean peach orchard
Montanaro, G., Dichio, B., Briccoli Bati, C., & Xiloyannis, C. (2012) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.020 · Cited by 73
Soil ecosystem services and intensified cropping systems
Olson, K. R., Al-Kaisi, M., Lal, R., & Morton, L. W. (2017) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.72.3.64a · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Al‐Kaisi, M. M., & Yin, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 437-445
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W1970489940
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn–Soybean Rotations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2005.0437
- The paper
- Al‐Kaisi, M. M., & Yin, X. (2005). Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn–Soybean Rotations. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.