Cover Crops Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Agroecosystems:A Global Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
Cover crops are well recognized as a tool to reduce NO leaching from agroecosystems. However, their effectiveness varies from site to site and year to year depending on soil, cash and cover crop management, and climate. We conducted a meta-analysis using 238 observations from 28 studies (i) to assess the overall effect of cover crops on NO leaching and subsequent crop yields, and (ii) to examine how soil, cash and cover crop management, and climate impact the effect of non-leguminous cover crops on NO leaching. There is a clear indication that nonleguminous cover crops can substantially reduce NO leaching into freshwater systems, on average by 56%. Nonlegume-legume cover crop mixtures reduced NO leaching as effectively as nonlegumes, but significantly more than legumes. The lack of variance information in most published literature prevents greater insight into the degree to which cover crops can improve water quality. Among the factors investigated, we identified cover crop planting dates, shoot biomass, and precipitation relative to long-term mean precipitation as potential drivers for the observed variability in nonleguminous cover crop effectiveness in reducing NO leaching. We found evidence indicating greater reduction in NO leaching with nonleguminous cover crops on coarse-textured soils and during years of low precipitation (<90% of the long-term normal). Earlier fall planting and greater nonleguminous shoot biomass further reduced NO leaching. Overall, this meta-analys…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nonleguminous cover crops are especially effective for reducing nitrate leaching.
“Nonleguminous cover crops are especially effective for reducing nitrate leaching (Constantin et al., 2010;”
From Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching (2022) · cites this paper as Thapa et al., 2018
The aforementioned cover crop effects were consistent with two meta-analyses, which estimated that late-summer-planted cover crops reduce NO3-N leached by 50 and 64%, respectively.
“The aforementioned cover crop effects were consistent with two meta-analyses (Quemada et al., 2013; Thapa et al., 2018), which estimated that late-summer-planted cover crops reduce NO3 -N leached by 50 and 64%, respectively.”
From Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching (2022) · cites this paper as Thapa et al., 2018
Cultivation of a cover crop can increase SOC stocks and, at the same time, can reduce N losses, thereby increasing soil N supply and possibly crop yields.
“For example, cultivation of a cover crop can increase SOC stocks and, at the same time, can reduce N losses, thereby increasing soil N supply and possibly crop yields (Thapa et al., 2018).”
From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Thapa et al., 2018
Cites
Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems
Diaz, R. J., & Rosenberg, R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156401 · Cited by 6,626 · see citing works
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
Brassica cover crops for nitrogen retention in the Mid-Atlantic coastal plain
Dean, J. E., & Weil, R. R. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0066 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Beillouin, D., Ben‐Ari, T., Malézieux, E., Seufert, V., & Makowski, D. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15747 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon
Moinet, G. Y. K., Hijbeek, R., van Vuuren, D. P., & Giller, K. E. (2023) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16570 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Do diverse cover crop mixtures perform better than monocultures? A systematic review
Florence, A. M., & McGuire, A. M. (2020) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.1002/agj2.20340 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Jacobs, A. A., Evans, R. S., Allison, J. K., Garner, E. R., Kingery, W. L., & McCulley, R. L. (2022) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.105310 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Fall cover crop nitrogen uptake drives reductions in winter-spring leaching
Sedghi, N., & Weil, R. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.1002/jeq2.20342 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thapa, R., Mirsky, S. B., & Tully, K. L.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tully, Katherine L.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1400-1411
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2896657897
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northeast SARE (GNE17‐160‐31064)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- cover crops, nitrate leaching, legume cover crops, cover crop mixtures, crop yield, water quality, soil texture, precipitation, sowing date, shoot biomass, agroecosystems
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Environmental Monitoring, Nitrates, Soil Pollutants, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review