The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Triple Testcross Analysis to Detect Epistasis in Maize
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) breeders have successfully exploited heterosis by crossing inbred lines to develop hybrids. Epistatic effects can contribute to the expression of heterosis for specific hybrids. The hybrid B73 × Mo17 was a widely grown hybrid with exceptional performance in the central U.S. Corn Belt during the late 1970s and early 1980s. The objective of this study was to determine if epistatic effects contribute significantly to the performance of B73 × Mo17. With use of the triple testcross design, 100 random F2 plants from B73 × Mo17 were testcrossed to B73, Mo17, and their F1. The 300 testcrosses were evaluated at three locations in 1992 and two locations in 1993. Triple testcross analysis suggested that epistatic effects were important for ear length, number of kernel rows, ear height, and flowering traits. In the analysis of variance, additive by additive effects were not significant for grain yield, whereas additive by dominance and dominance by dominance effects were significant. The additive by additive by environment interaction was more important than additive by additive effects per se for grain yield. Epistatic deviations from the comparison of testcross means suggest that B73 had favorable additive by additive effects for grain yield, barren plants, kernel‐row number, ear height, and silk delay. Inbred Mo17 had favorable additive by additive effects for ear length. The presence of significant positive epistatic effects may have contributed to the expression…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is ample evidence for the importance of epistasis in crops, including for economically important traits such as grain yield in maize [31–33].”
From Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation (2015) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation
Technow, F., Messina, C. D., Totir, L. R., & Cooper, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130855 · Cited by 265
“There is ample evidence for the importance of epistasis in crops, including for economically important traits such as grain yield in maize (Wolf and Hallauer [31], Eta-Ndu and Openshaw [32]; Holland [33]).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, D. P., & Hallauer, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Golden Harvest Research R.R. 2, Box 204 Nevada IA 50201
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hallauer, Arnel R.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 763-770
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1995925807
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Keywords
- epistasis, maize, heterosis, grain yield, ear length, kernel row number, ear height, flowering characteristics, inbred lines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Triple Testcross Analysis to Detect Epistasis in Maize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700030012x
- The paper
- Wolf, D. P., & Hallauer, A. R. (1997). Triple Testcross Analysis to Detect Epistasis in Maize. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700030012x