The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yield Potential: Its Definition, Measurement, and Significance
Abstract
Yield potential is defined as the yield of a cultivar when grown in environments to which it is adapted, with nutrients and water non‐limiting and with pests, diseases, weeds, lodging, and other stresses effectively controlled. As such, it is distinguished from potential yield, which we define here as the maximum yield which could be reached by a crop in given environments, as determined, for example, by simulation models with plausible physiological and agronomic assumptions. Several implications of the definitions given above are considered, particularly those arising from cultivar interactions with agronomic practices and with the biotic and abiotic environments. We then discuss both direct and indirect methods of measuring progress in yield potential. Continuing progress in yield potential through conventional breeding is apparent in many crops, and is significant for yield progress at the farm level under a wide range of conditions. Among the small grain cereals, greater yield potential has derived mainly from the rise in harvest index associated with dwarfing, whereas in maize (Zea mays L.), it has come from increased tolerance to closer planting. The duration of photosynthetic activity has been extended in several crops but there is little evidence of increases in photosynthetic capacity or maximum crop growth rate. The rise in genetic yield potential in wheat and maize cultivars has been associated with progressive widening of their genetic background, and there is little sign of this slowing down.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887
Self-citationGenetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes.
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L., & Taylor, M. (1980) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600028665 · Cited by 805
Self-citation
Cited by
Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?
LONG, S. P., ZHU, X., NAIDU, S. L., & ORT, D. R. (2006) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x · Cited by 1,586
Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?
van Ittersum, M. K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Wolf, J., Grassini, P., van Wart, J., Guilpart, N., Claessens, L., de Groot, H., Wiebe, K., Mason-D’Croz, D., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1610359113 · Cited by 899
The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis
Neumann, K., Verburg, P. H., Stehfest, E., & Müller, C. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.02.004 · Cited by 587
Simkin, A. J., Kapoor, L., Doss, C. G. P., Hofmann, T. A., Lawson, T., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2022) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-021-00892-6 · Cited by 561
Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment
Slafer, G. A., Savin, R., & Sadras, V. O. (2014) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.004 · Cited by 487
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, L. T., & Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1544-1551
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W182128310
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yield Potential: Its Definition, Measurement, and Significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961544x
- The paper
- Evans, L. T., & Fischer, R. A. (1999). Yield Potential: Its Definition, Measurement, and Significance. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961544x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.