Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective

Specht, J. E., Hume, D. J., Kumudini, S. V.·1999·Crop Science

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields in the USA have risen 22.6 kg ha−1 yr−1 from 1924 to 1997, but in the last quarter century (1972–1997) have risen 40% faster, 31.4 kg ha−1 yr−1 This upward trend in on‐farm yield is fueled by rapid producer adoption of technologies emerging from agricultural research. Published estimates of the annual gain in yield attributable to genetic improvement averaged about 15 kg ha−1 yr−1 prior to the 1980s, but is now averaging about 30 kg ha−1 yr−1 in both the public and proprietary sectors. Periodic advances in agronomic technology, and a relentless rise in atmospheric CO 2 (currently 1.5 μL L−1 yr−1), also contribute to the upward trend in on‐farm yield. In Nebraska, irrigated yield averages 800 kg ha−1 more than rainfed yield, and is improving at a 40% faster annual rate (35.1 vs. 24.9 kg ha−1). About 36% of the annual variation in the irrigated‐rainfed yield difference is attributable to annual variation in absolute rainfed yield. Inadequate water obviously limits absolute crop yield, but also seems to be an obstacle in terms of the rate of yield improvement. Several physiological traits changed during six decades of cultivar releases in Ontario that led to a genetic gain in yield of about 0.5% yr−1 Changes in some traits were obvious (improved lodging), but more subtle in others (greater N 2‐fixation, greater stress tolerance). In terms of photosynthate supplied to sinks across a wide range of environments, recent cultivars seem to be superior to obsolete ones. To sustain and enhance soybean yield improvement in the future, technological innovation must be continually injected into the agricultural enterprise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
Specht, J. E., Hume, D. J., & Kumudini, S. V.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1560-1570
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W1963812993
Cited by
457
References
1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
The paper
Specht, J. E., Hume, D. J., & Kumudini, S. V. (1999). Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.