The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective
Abstract
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields in the USA have risen 22.6 kg ha−1 yr−1 from 1924 to 1997, but in the last quarter century (1972–1997) have risen 40% faster, 31.4 kg ha−1 yr−1 This upward trend in on‐farm yield is fueled by rapid producer adoption of technologies emerging from agricultural research. Published estimates of the annual gain in yield attributable to genetic improvement averaged about 15 kg ha−1 yr−1 prior to the 1980s, but is now averaging about 30 kg ha−1 yr−1 in both the public and proprietary sectors. Periodic advances in agronomic technology, and a relentless rise in atmospheric CO 2 (currently 1.5 μL L−1 yr−1), also contribute to the upward trend in on‐farm yield. In Nebraska, irrigated yield averages 800 kg ha−1 more than rainfed yield, and is improving at a 40% faster annual rate (35.1 vs. 24.9 kg ha−1). About 36% of the annual variation in the irrigated‐rainfed yield difference is attributable to annual variation in absolute rainfed yield. Inadequate water obviously limits absolute crop yield, but also seems to be an obstacle in terms of the rate of yield improvement. Several physiological traits changed during six decades of cultivar releases in Ontario that led to a genetic gain in yield of about 0.5% yr−1 Changes in some traits were obvious (improved lodging), but more subtle in others (greater N 2‐fixation, greater stress tolerance). In terms of photosynthate supplied to sinks across a wide range of environments, recent cultivars seem to be superior to obsolete ones. To sustain and enhance soybean yield improvement in the future, technological innovation must be continually injected into the agricultural enterprise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance
Tollenaar, M., & Wu, J. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961597x · Cited by 609
Cited by
Borrás, L., Slafer, G. A., & Otegui, M. E. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.002 · Cited by 874
Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends
Grassini, P., Eskridge, K. M., & Cassman, K. G. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3918 · Cited by 835
Increasing Crop Productivity to Meet Global Needs for Feed, Food, and Fuel
Edgerton, M. D. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.108.130195 · Cited by 513
Koester, R. P., Skoneczka, J. A., Cary, T. R., Diers, B. W., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru187 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Specht, J. E., Hume, D. J., & Kumudini, S. V.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1560-1570
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1963812993
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
- The paper
- Specht, J. E., Hume, D. J., & Kumudini, S. V. (1999). Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.