The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yield Potential, Plant Assimilatory Capacity, and Metabolic Efficiencies
Open accessAbstract
The structure, control, and efficiency of photosynthetic and respiratory systems are examined. Genetic control is complex and highly conserved. While many features are still unresolved, basic efficiency seems little altered by domestication and breeding of crops. Rubisco, the carboxylase–oxygenase enzyme central to photosynthesis and photorespiration, remains a weak point but may be amenable to improvement. However, the actual radiation‐use efficiency of crops is generally less than the potential with present rubisco kinetics, leaving considerable room for improvement without change in rubisco. Good opportunities for progress lie in definition of optimal canopies of leaves having suitable acclimation and photoprotection. The efficiency of the respiratory system also seems unaffected by plant breeding. Precise evaluation of the roles and efficiencies of the glycolytic pathway and the tricarboxylic acid cycle in production is difficult because, in addition to being sources of energy carriers and reductant, those systems also supply carbon skeletons for biosyntheses. How those systems are controlled and balanced for such diversions is largely unknown. The alternative oxidase found in mitochondria may be involved in that balance but its true role(s) is also unknown. Distinguishing two components of respiration, one related to maintenance and the other to growth, remains a powerful tool in theoretical studies. In such work, the respiratory system appears efficient, but proving that in experiments remains elusive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887
Cited by
Future scenarios of European agricultural land use
Rounsevell, M. D. A., Ewert, F., Reginster, I., Leemans, R., & Carter, T. R. (2005) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.002 · Cited by 423
Reynolds, M. P., Rajaram, S., & Sayre, K. D. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961611x · Cited by 310
Koester, R. P., Skoneczka, J. A., Cary, T. R., Diers, B. W., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru187 · Cited by 284
MIGUEZ, F. E., ZHU, X., HUMPHRIES, S., BOLLERO, G. A., & LONG, S. P. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01019.x · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Loomis, R. S., & Amthor, J. S.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1584-1596
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1980748611
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yield Potential, Plant Assimilatory Capacity, and Metabolic Efficiencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961584x
- The paper
- Loomis, R. S., & Amthor, J. S. (1999). Yield Potential, Plant Assimilatory Capacity, and Metabolic Efficiencies. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961584x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.