Cited by 79Bioenergy crop production and managementCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

A semimechanistic model predicting the growth and production of the bioenergy crop Miscanthus×giganteus: description, parameterization and validation

MIGUEZ, FERNANDO E., ZHU, XINGUANG, HUMPHRIES, STEPHEN, BOLLERO, GERMÁN A., LONG, STEPHEN P.·2009·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Biomass based bioenergy is promoted as a major sustainable energy source which can simultaneously decrease net greenhouse gas emissions. Miscanthus×giganteus (M.×giganteus), a C4 perennial grass with high nitrogen, water, and light use efficiencies, is regarded as a promising energy crop for biomass production. Mathematical models which can accurately predict M.×giganteus biomass production potential under different conditions are critical to evaluate the feasibility of its production in different environments. Although previous models based on light‐conversion efficiency have been shown to provide good predictions of yield, they cannot easily be used in assessing the value of physiological trait improvement or ecosystem processes. Here, we described in detail the physical and physiological processes of a previously published generic mechanistic eco‐physiological model, WIMOVAC, adapted and parameterized for M.×giganteus. Parameterized for one location in England, the model was able to realistically predict daily field diurnal photosynthesis and seasonal biomass at a range of other sites from European studies. The model provides a framework that will allow incorporation of further mechanistic information as it is developed for this new crop.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01019.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MIGUEZ, F. E., ZHU, X., HUMPHRIES, S., BOLLERO, G. A., & LONG, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
MIGUEZ, FERNANDO E.
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
282-296
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2117317455
Cited by
79
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, biomass production, diurnal photosynthesis, model parameterization, energy crops, perennial grasses, C4 plants, model validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review