Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions

J. L. Araus, Dolors Villegas, Nieves Aparicio, L. F. García del Moral, S. Elhani, Yahia Rharrabti, Juan Pedro Ferrio, Conxita Royo·2003·Crop Science

Abstract

The effect of environment on the relationship between grain carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) and yield was studied for durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) under Mediterranean conditions. A group of 25 genotypes was grown under contrasting water regimes in two regions of Spain during three years. The first objective was to determine the environmental factors responsible for the strong positive relationship previously observed between Δ and yield across trials. Environmental factors tested were total water input (Wi), mean temperature, accumulated reference evapotranspiration (ET0), and the ratio Wi/ET0 during different periods of the crop cycle. Water input during grain filling was the variable most strongly correlated with grain Δ and yield across all the trials, as well as across the subset of trials in northeastern Spain. In southeastern Spain, the most drought prone of the two regions, Wi from sowing to heading explained the most variation in grain Δ and yield. The second objective was to study the effect of environment on the relationship between Δ and yield across genotypes. No significant correlation was found for trials with a mean yield up to about 2000 kg ha−1, but the strength of the relationship increased sharply and attained significance in trials yielding 2500 kg ha−1 When yield above 2500 kg ha−1 the correlation between Δ and yield remained relatively steady and positive, with an r value around 0.5. It is concluded that breeding to raise durum wheat yield in Mediterranean conditions could take advantage of selecting for higher Δ only in relatively wet years or under supplementary irrigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2135/cropsci2003.0170

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Araus, J. L., Villegas, D., Aparicio, N., del Moral, L. F. G., Elhani, S., Rharrabti, Y., Ferrio, J. P., & Royo, C.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
170-170
ISSN
0011-183X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052521036
Cited by
236
References
4
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2003.0170
The paper
Araus, J. L., Villegas, D., Aparicio, N., del Moral, L. F. G., Elhani, S., Rharrabti, Y., Ferrio, J. P., & Royo, C. (2003). Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0170

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.