The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions
Abstract
The effect of environment on the relationship between grain carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) and yield was studied for durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) under Mediterranean conditions. A group of 25 genotypes was grown under contrasting water regimes in two regions of Spain during three years. The first objective was to determine the environmental factors responsible for the strong positive relationship previously observed between Δ and yield across trials. Environmental factors tested were total water input (Wi), mean temperature, accumulated reference evapotranspiration (ET0), and the ratio Wi/ET0 during different periods of the crop cycle. Water input during grain filling was the variable most strongly correlated with grain Δ and yield across all the trials, as well as across the subset of trials in northeastern Spain. In southeastern Spain, the most drought prone of the two regions, Wi from sowing to heading explained the most variation in grain Δ and yield. The second objective was to study the effect of environment on the relationship between Δ and yield across genotypes. No significant correlation was found for trials with a mean yield up to about 2000 kg ha−1, but the strength of the relationship increased sharply and attained significance in trials yielding 2500 kg ha−1 When yield above 2500 kg ha−1 the correlation between Δ and yield remained relatively steady and positive, with an r value around 0.5. It is concluded that breeding to raise durum wheat yield in Mediterranean conditions could take advantage of selecting for higher Δ only in relatively wet years or under supplementary irrigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309 · cited 2×
“Genotypic of grains (Blum, 1988; Loss and Siddique, 1994), thereby variation in carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration effiaffecting the isotope signature of mature kernels, may ciency in wheat.”
BackgroundPlant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for?
ARAUS, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf049 · Cited by 1,243
Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887 · cited 1×
“Carbon isotope discrimination has largely been rec- synthesis and transpiration (Fischer et al., 1998).”
Background
Cited by
Breeding for high water-use efficiency
Condon, A. G. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh277 · Cited by 1,208
Lopes, M. S., & Reynolds, M. P. (2010) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp09121 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Araus, J. L., Villegas, D., Aparicio, N., del Moral, L. F. G., Elhani, S., Rharrabti, Y., Ferrio, J. P., & Royo, C.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-170
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052521036
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2003.0170
- The paper
- Araus, J. L., Villegas, D., Aparicio, N., del Moral, L. F. G., Elhani, S., Rharrabti, Y., Ferrio, J. P., & Royo, C. (2003). Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.