The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response to Direct Selection for Grain Yield under Drought Stress in Rice
Abstract
Drought is a major cause of yield loss in rain‐fed rice ( Oryza sativa L.), grown on over 40 million ha in Asia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of direct selection for yield under drought stress in upland rice in populations derived from crosses between irrigated high‐yielding cultivars and upland‐adapted cultivars. Random F 2:4 lines from five populations were screened for grain yield in fully irrigated lowland fields under nonstress conditions and in uplands under severe reproductive‐stage drought stress. Stress caused mean yield reduction of 64% across populations. Broad‐sense heritability for yield was not consistently lower in stress than in nonstress trials. Response to selection was evaluated in two crosses in subsequent seasons. Stress‐selected lines had a yield advantage of 25 to 34% over random lines when evaluated at stress levels similar to those in which they were selected. Yield gains under very severe stress occurred only in a population derived from a highly tolerant parent. Direct selection usually gave greater response under stress than indirect selection under nonstress conditions. Direct selection under dry‐season stress also gave response under naturally occurring wet‐season stress. These results support the hypothesis that selection for yield under reproductive‐stage drought stress is effective in rice, and that choice of donor is very important in breeding drought‐tolerant rice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309 · cited 2×
“Theory developed by Falconer (1989) and extended to the analysis of plant breeding programs by Pederson and Rathjen (1981) and Atlin and Frey (1989, 1990) permits breeding strategies to be evaluated on the basis of the predicted response in the target environment resulting from selection conducted in a selection envir…”
BackgroundBänziger, M., & Cooper, M. (2001) · Euphytica · doi:10.1023/a:1017510928038 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Ram, T., Yadaw, R. B., Mishra, K. K., & Mandal, N. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru363 · Cited by 423
Vikram, P., Swamy, B. M., Dixit, S., Ahmed, H. U., Teresa Sta Cruz, M., Singh, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2011) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-89 · Cited by 391
Ayaz, M., Ahmad, R., Shahzad, M., Khan, N., Shah, M. M., & Khan, S. A. (2015) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.025 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Venuprasad, R., Lafitte, H. R., & Atlin, G. N.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-293
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2083611731
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response to Direct Selection for Grain Yield under Drought Stress in Rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0181
- The paper
- Venuprasad, R., Lafitte, H. R., & Atlin, G. N. (2007). Response to Direct Selection for Grain Yield under Drought Stress in Rice. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.