The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
qDTY 1.1 , a major QTL for rice grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress with a consistent effect in multiple elite genetic backgrounds
Open accessAbstract
Background: Drought is one of the most important abiotic stresses causing drastic reductions in yield in rainfed rice environments. The suitability of grain yield (GY) under drought as a selection criterion has been reported in the past few years. Most of the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for GY under drought in rice reported so far has been in the background of low-yielding susceptible varieties. Such QTLs have not shown a similar effect in multiple high- yielding drought-susceptible varieties, thus limiting their use in marker-assisted selection. Genetic control of GY under reproductive-stage drought stress (RS) in elite genetic backgrounds was studied in three F 3:4 mapping populations derived from crosses of N22, a drought-tolerant aus cultivar, with Swarna, IR64, and MTU1010, three high-yielding popular mega-varieties, with the aim to identify QTLs for GY under RS that show a consistent effect in multiple elite genetic backgrounds. Three populations were phenotyped under RS in the dry seasons (DS) of 2009 and 2010 at IRRI. For genotyping, whole-genome scans for N22/MTU1010 and bulked segregant analysis for N22/Swarna and N22/IR64 were employed using SSR markers. Results: A major QTL for GY under RS, qDTY 1.1 , was identified on rice chromosome 1 flanked by RM11943 and RM431 in all three populations. In combined analysis over two years, qDTY 1.1 showed an additive effect of 29.3%, 24.3%, and 16.1% of mean yield in N22/Swarna, N22/IR64, and N22/MTU1010, respectively, under RS. qDTY 1.1 also showed a positive effect on GY in non-stress (NS) situations in N22/Swarna, N22/IR64 over both years, and N22/MTU1010 in DS2009. Conclusions: This is the first reported QTL in rice with a major and consistent effect in multiple elite genetic backgrounds under both RS and NS situations. Consistency of the QTL effect across different genetic backgrounds makes it a suitable candidate for use in marker-assisted breeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,682
Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA
Murray, M. G., & Thompson, W. F. (1980) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/8.19.4321 · Cited by 12,098
Michelmore, R. W., Paran, I., & Kesseli, R. V. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.21.9828 · Cited by 4,535
Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal
PATTERSON, H. D., & THOMPSON, R. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.545 · Cited by 4,058
The map-based sequence of the rice genome
International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, & Sasaki, T. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03895 · Cited by 3,797
Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models
McCulloch, C. E., & Searle, S. R. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471722073 · Cited by 2,994
Bates, B. C., Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Wu, S. (2008) · TaCCIRe Repository (Sokoine University of Agriculture) · Cited by 2,640
Development and Mapping of 2240 New SSR Markers for Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
McCouch, S. R. (2002) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/9.6.199 · Cited by 1,528
Temnykh, S., DeClerck, G., Lukashova, A., Lipovich, L., Cartinhour, S., & McCouch, S. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.184001 · Cited by 1,477
Cited by
Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes
WANG, H., MISZTAL, I., AGUILAR, I., LEGARRA, A., & MUIR, W. M. (2012) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672312000274 · Cited by 632
Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Ram, T., Yadaw, R. B., Mishra, K. K., & Mandal, N. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru363 · Cited by 423
Self-citationDixit, S., Singh, A., Sandhu, N., Bhandari, A., Vikram, P., & Kumar, A. (2017) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-017-0737-2 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vikram, P., Swamy, B. M., Dixit, S., Ahmed, H. U., Teresa Sta Cruz, M., Singh, A. K., & Kumar, A.
- Venue
- BMC Genetics
- Published
- 2011-10-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-89
- ISSN
- 1471-2156 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034423376
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 20.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: qDTY 1.1 , a major QTL for rice grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress with a consistent effect in multiple elite genetic backgrounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2156-12-89
- The paper
- Vikram, P., Swamy, B. M., Dixit, S., Ahmed, H. U., Teresa Sta Cruz, M., Singh, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2011). qDTY 1.1 , a major QTL for rice grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress with a consistent effect in multiple elite genetic backgrounds. BMC Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
