Cited by 79Bioenergy crop production and managementGenetics and Plant BreedingAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Selection for Biomass Yield in Upland, Lowland, and Hybrid Switchgrass

Casler, Michael D., Vogel, Kenneth P.·2014·Crop Science

Abstract

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a candidate for cellulosic bioenergy feedstock development in many parts of North America, Europe, and Asia. Breeding for increased biomass yield is a viable and desirable research objective to improve both economic and energy yields per hectare. The objectives of this study were to estimate progress from (i) selection for biomass yield in upland switchgrass, (ii) selection for winter survival, biomass yield, and biomass quality in lowland switchgrass, and (iii) advanced‐generation heterosis effects in four upland × lowland hybrid switchgrass populations. Selection for increased biomass yield in upland switchgrass resulted in mean genetic gains for of 0.71 Mg ha−1 per cycle (8% per cycle = 4% yr−1) for biomass yield. Selection for increased biomass yield in lowland switchgrass resulted in mean genetic gains of 0.89 Mg ha−1 (18% = 1% yr−1) for biomass yield. Mean high‐parent heterosis between upland and lowland ecotypes was 3.57 Mg ha−1 (43%). These gains in biomass yield resulted in significant increases in ethanol production for a fermentation platform or high heating value for a combustion platform. Biomass yield is a moderately heritable trait in switchgrass and it can be readily improved in both upland and lowland populations using conventional breeding methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0239

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casler, M. D., & Vogel, K. P.
Affiliations
  • U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Casler, Michael D.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
626-636
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W1988301449
Cited by
79
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8
FWCI
23.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crop Science (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
switchgrass, biomass yield, heterosis, winter survival, biomass quality, genetic gain, ethanol production, higher heating value, heritability, breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review