Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Particle Size Fractions and Their Use in Studies of Soil Organic Matter: I. The Nature and Distribution of Forms of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur

Anderson, D. W., Saggar, S., Bettany, J. R., Stewart, J. W. B.·1981·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Organo‐mineral complexes in various size fractions from the surface horizons of two Chernozemic soils (Typic Argiboroll and Udic Haploboroll) were separated without chemical pretreatment by ultrasonic dispersion in water, followed by sieving and centrifugation. The organic carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) composition in the size fractions and the degree of polycondensation of humic materials extracted by an alkaline pyrophosphate technique were compared. Fifty‐five to 58% of the organic C was in the clay fraction, with greatest absolute amounts in the coarse clay (2–0.2 µm). Carbon/nitrogen ratios narrowed as particle size decreased. The organic matter separated from the coarse‐clay and fine‐silt fractions (5–2 µm) was dominated by conventional humic acids (HA‐A), which based on their strong adsorption at 280 nm and resistance to acid hydrolysis, were considered strongly aromatic and recalcitrant in soil. In contrast, the organic matter associated with the fine clay (<0.2 µm) was largely fulvic acids (FA‐A, FA‐B) and humic acids (HA‐B) that were less aromatic than conventional humic acids and contained considerable amounts of hydrolyzable N. The fine‐ and coarse‐clay fractions (<2 µm) contained >70% of the total soil S, >80% of the HI‐reducible S, and >64% of the carbohydrate C. In relation to C and N, S was preferentially associated with the fine‐clay fractions. The C/S and N/S ratios decreased substantially from maximum values in the fine‐silt fraction (approximately 120:1 and 10:1, respectively) to minimum values in fine clay (approximately 33:1 and 4.5:1, respectively). The distinct differences between the humus of the coarse clay‐fine silt and the fine‐clay fractions indicate that size fractionation following ultrasonic dispersion in water is a promising method of isolating stable and labile forms of soil organic matter. The data also support earlier hypotheses on the nature of soil S that were based on studies of chemical separation of organic matter from complete soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500040018x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, D. W., Saggar, S., Bettany, J. R., & Stewart, J. W. B.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-07
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
767-772
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2051333008
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle Size Fractions and Their Use in Studies of Soil Organic Matter: I. The Nature and Distribution of Forms of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500040018x
The paper
Anderson, D. W., Saggar, S., Bettany, J. R., & Stewart, J. W. B. (1981). Particle Size Fractions and Their Use in Studies of Soil Organic Matter: I. The Nature and Distribution of Forms of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500040018x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.