The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Particle Size Fractions and Their Use in Studies of Soil Organic Matter: I. The Nature and Distribution of Forms of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur
Abstract
Organo‐mineral complexes in various size fractions from the surface horizons of two Chernozemic soils (Typic Argiboroll and Udic Haploboroll) were separated without chemical pretreatment by ultrasonic dispersion in water, followed by sieving and centrifugation. The organic carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) composition in the size fractions and the degree of polycondensation of humic materials extracted by an alkaline pyrophosphate technique were compared. Fifty‐five to 58% of the organic C was in the clay fraction, with greatest absolute amounts in the coarse clay (2–0.2 µm). Carbon/nitrogen ratios narrowed as particle size decreased. The organic matter separated from the coarse‐clay and fine‐silt fractions (5–2 µm) was dominated by conventional humic acids (HA‐A), which based on their strong adsorption at 280 nm and resistance to acid hydrolysis, were considered strongly aromatic and recalcitrant in soil. In contrast, the organic matter associated with the fine clay (<0.2 µm) was largely fulvic acids (FA‐A, FA‐B) and humic acids (HA‐B) that were less aromatic than conventional humic acids and contained considerable amounts of hydrolyzable N. The fine‐ and coarse‐clay fractions (<2 µm) contained >70% of the total soil S, >80% of the HI‐reducible S, and >64% of the carbohydrate C. In relation to C and N, S was preferentially associated with the fine‐clay fractions. The C/S and N/S ratios decreased substantially from maximum values in the fine‐silt fraction (approximately 120:1 and 10:1, respectively) to minimum values in fine clay (approximately 33:1 and 4.5:1, respectively). The distinct differences between the humus of the coarse clay‐fine silt and the fine‐clay fractions indicate that size fractionation following ultrasonic dispersion in water is a promising method of isolating stable and labile forms of soil organic matter. The data also support earlier hypotheses on the nature of soil S that were based on studies of chemical separation of organic matter from complete soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., & Cole, C. V. (1988) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf02180320 · Cited by 1,453
Self-citationPhysical Fractionation of Soil and Organic Matter in Primary Particle Size and Density Separates
Christensen, B. T. (1992) · Advances in Soil Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2930-8_1 · Cited by 1,118
Physical control of soil organic matter dynamics in the tropics
Feller, C., & Beare, M. H. (1997) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00039-6 · Cited by 925
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, D. W., Saggar, S., Bettany, J. R., & Stewart, J. W. B.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 767-772
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2051333008
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle Size Fractions and Their Use in Studies of Soil Organic Matter: I. The Nature and Distribution of Forms of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500040018x
- The paper
- Anderson, D. W., Saggar, S., Bettany, J. R., & Stewart, J. W. B. (1981). Particle Size Fractions and Their Use in Studies of Soil Organic Matter: I. The Nature and Distribution of Forms of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Sulfur. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500040018x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.