Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Bulk Density Comparisons in Two Cropland Tillage Systems after 25 Years and in Virgin Grassland

Bauer, Armand, Black, A. L.·1981·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Stubble mulching is advocated as a desirable soil management practice, but no data are available for the northern Great Plains showing the effect of its long‐term use on soil properties. Neither have any comparisons been made of organic carbon (C) levels in cropland and virgin grassland in this region since 1947. Four farm field sites, each of moderately coarse‐, medium‐, and fine‐textured soils under conventional tillage, stubble mulch tillage, and virgin grassland (never cultivated) were sampled at 0 to 7.6, 7.6 to 15.2, 15.2 to 30.5, and 30.5 to 45.7 cm to measure organic C, total nitrogen (N), and bulk density. Average organic C and total N to a depth of 45.7 cm, % by weight, were significantly higher under stubble mulch than conventional tillage management. Organic C concentration in moderately coarse‐ and fine‐textured soils was 44 and 13% higher, respectively, under stubble mulch than conventional management, but it did not differ between the two management systems in medium‐textured soils. The percentage loss of C and N from the 0‐ to 7.6‐ and 7.6‐ to 15.2‐cm soil zones due to cropping as compared to virgin grassland was no greater than the percentage loss found in 1947 at field stations after nearly 40 years of cropping. In another comparison considering only medium‐textured soils on farm fields, percentage loss of organic C after about 70 years of cropping, using 1979 virgin grasslands as a reference, was no greater than loss after about 40 years of cropping, using 1950 virgin grasslands. Continued cultivation of dryland soils, especially with stuhble mulching, has maintained organic C and total N at higher levels than was projected from earlier research. Cropland bulk densities to 30.5 cm ranged from 7 to 20% higher than on grassland but did not differ between conventional and stubble mulch tillage management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060032x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Bauer, A., & Black, A. L.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1166-1170
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2023139950
Cited by
227
References
0
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Bulk Density Comparisons in Two Cropland Tillage Systems after 25 Years and in Virgin Grassland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060032x
The paper
Bauer, A., & Black, A. L. (1981). Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Bulk Density Comparisons in Two Cropland Tillage Systems after 25 Years and in Virgin Grassland. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060032x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.