The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects
Open accessAbstract
Because of concerns about the eventual impact of atmospheric CO 2 accumulations, there is growing interest in reducing net CO 2 emissions from soil and increasing C storage in soil. This review presents a framework to assess soil erosion and deposition processes on the distribution and loss of C in soils. The physical processes of erosion and deposition affect soil C distribution in two main ways and should be considered when evaluating the impact of agriculture on C storage. First, these processes redistribute considerable amounts of soil C, within a toposequence or a field, or to a distant site. Accurate estimates of soil redistribution in the landscape or field are needed to quantify the relative magnitude of soil lost by erosion and accumulated by deposition. Secondly, erosion and deposition drastically alter the biological process of C mineralization in soil landscapes. Whereas erosion and deposition only redistribute soil and organic C, mineralization results in a net loss of C from the soil system to the atmosphere. Little is known about the magnitude of organic C losses by mineralization and those due to erosion, but the limited data available suggest that mineralization predominates in the first years after the initial cultivation of the soil, and that erosion becomes a major factor in later years. Soils in depositional sites usually contain a larger proportion of the total organic C in labile fractions of soil C because this material can be easily transported. If the accumulation of soil in depositional areas is extensive, the net result of the burial (and subsequent reduction in decomposition) of this active soil organic matter would be increased C storage. Soil erosion is the most widespread form of soil degradation . At regional or global levels its greatest impact on C storage may be in affecting soil productivity. Erosion usually results in decreased primary productivity, which in turn adversely affects C storage in soil because of the reduced quantity of organic C returned to the soil as plant residues . Thus the use of management practices that prevent or reduce soil erosion may be the best strategy to maintain, or possibly increase, the worlds soil C storage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning
Wischmeier, W. H., & Smith, D. D. (1978) · Cited by 7,379
Analysis of Factors Controlling Soil Organic Matter Levels in Great Plains Grasslands
Parton, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Cole, C. V., & Ojima, D. S. (1987) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x · Cited by 3,759
Aggregate Structure and Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in Native and Cultivated Soils
Elliott, E. T. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030017x · Cited by 2,499
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss95-075 · Cited by 1,686
THE TURNOVER OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER IN SOME OF THE ROTHAMSTED CLASSICAL EXPERIMENTS
JENKINSON, D. S., & RAYNER, J. H. (1977) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-197705000-00005 · Cited by 1,160
Physical Fractionation of Soil and Organic Matter in Primary Particle Size and Density Separates
Christensen, B. T. (1992) · Advances in Soil Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2930-8_1 · Cited by 1,118
Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils
Davidson, E. A., & Ackerman, I. L. (1993) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00000786 · Cited by 927
Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils
Carter, M. R., & Stewart, B. A. (2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003075561 · Cited by 798
Jenny, H. (1980) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6112-4 · Cited by 781
Cited by
Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
Lal, R. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032 · Cited by 3,936
Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands
Wright, C. K., & Wimberly, M. C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215404110 · Cited by 860
Lal, R., Negassa, W., & Lorenz, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.002 · Cited by 580
A critical review of the possible adverse effects of biochar in the soil environment
Brtnicky, M., Datta, R., Holatko, J., Bielska, L., Gusiatin, Z. M., Kucerik, J., Hammerschmiedt, T., Danish, S., Radziemska, M., Mravcova, L., et al. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148756 · Cited by 331
Rees, R. M., Bingham, I. J., Baddeley, J. A., & Watson, C. A. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregorich, E. G., Greer, K. J., Anderson, D. W., & Liang, B. C.
- Venue
- Soil and Tillage Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 291-302
- ISSN
- 0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043081356
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00117-2
- The paper
- Gregorich, E. G., Greer, K. J., Anderson, D. W., & Liang, B. C. (1998). Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects. Soil and Tillage Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00117-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.