Cited by 104Soil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil and Unsaturated Flow

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rates of Change in Soil Structural Stability under Forages and Corn

Perfect, E., Kay, B. D., van Loon, W. K. P., Sheard, R. W., Pojasok, T.·1990·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Abstract Data on rates of change in soil structural stability under different cropping systems are scarce. Field measurements of changes in dispersible clay (DC) and wet aggregate stability (WAS) were made during 3 yr in six forage treatments and conventional and zero‐till corn ( Zea mays L.). The study was conducted on a silt loam soil (fine‐silty, mixed, mesic Typic Haplaquept intergrading to fine‐silty, mixed, mesic Typic Eutrochrept) near Elora, ON, Canada. The DC and WAS changed exponentially with soil water content at time of sampling and were adjusted for this parameter before calculating changes with time. No increases in structural stability occurred during the 3‐yr time period within the corn treatments. In contrast, all of the forage treatments resulted in highly significant rates of structural improvement. A half‐life parameter was used to quantify these changes. Calculated half lives for the different forages were similar in magnitude, being approximately 2.7 and 5.4 yr for DC and WAS, respectively. Across the treatments, highly significant correlations were found between rates of structural stabilization and mean root length ( r = −0.57 for WAS, significant at P = 0.01), mean root weight ( r = −0.56 for DC and −0.65 for WAS, significant at P = 0.01) and the coefficient of variation for soil water content ( r = −0.64 for DC and −0.56 for WAS, significant at P = 0.01). Forages may promote structural improvement through their influence on the amplitude of wetting and drying cycles. In addition, large increases in stability were observed over the intervening winter months, suggesting a freeze‐thaw effect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010028x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overwinter changes in soil structural attributes from freeze-thaw cycles may also contribute to lower SBD in near-surface depths.

    “Overwinter changes in soil structural attributes from freeze-thaw cycles may also contribute to lower SBD in near-surface depths (Perfect et al., 1990), though investigations on this topic are scarce.”

    From Field-scale soil property changes under switchgrass managed for bioenergy (2011) · cites this paper as Perfect et al., 1990

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Perfect, E., Kay, B. D., van Loon, W. K. P., Sheard, R. W., & Pojasok, T.
Corresponding author
Perfect, E.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
179-186
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2037913697
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Keywords
soil aggregate stability, wet aggregate stability, forage crops, conventional tillage, half-life, root length, root weight, soil moisture, wetting-drying cycles, freeze-thaw effects, silt loam soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review