Cited by 3,044Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transport

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Particulate Soil Organic‐Matter Changes across a Grassland Cultivation Sequence

Cambardella, C. A., Elliott, E. T.·1992·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Many models have been constructed in an attempt to describe the dynamics of soil organic‐matter (SOM) turnover, most of which include 2 to 3 kinetically defined organic‐matter pools. Physical and chemical definition of these conceptualized SOM pools has been difficult. We describe a simple method for dispersion of soil to isolate a particulate organic‐matter (POM) fraction that may represent an important SOM pool in grassland soils. The POM fraction was isolated by dispersing the soil in 5 g L −1 hexametaphosphate and passing the dispersed soil samples through a 53‐µm sieve. We compared POM and mineral‐associated C among three tillage treatments (20 yr under cultivation) and an undisturbed grassland at Sidney, NE. The POM C in the native sod represented 39% of the total soil organic C. Twenty years of bare‐fallow, stubble‐mulch, and no‐till management reduced the C content in this fraction to 18, 19, and 25%, respectively, of the total organic C. The mineral‐associated organic‐matter fraction showed no reduction in C content in the bare‐fallow treatment compared with the grassland soil but increased in the no‐till and stubble‐mulch treatments. Nitrogen dynamics generally mirrored those observed for C. Analysis of the POM fraction for lignin and cellulose content indicated that this fraction was 47% lignin and had a lignocellulose index of 0.7. The stable C‐isotope composition of the POM fraction suggests that wheat‐derived POM turns over faster than grass‐derived POM. We suggest the POM fraction closely matches the characteristics of a SOM pool variously described as slow, decomposable, or stabilized organic matter.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,044

Metadata

Authors
Cambardella, C. A., & Elliott, E. T.
Affiliations
  • National Soil Tilth Lab. 2150 Pammel Drive Ames IA 50011
  • Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cambardella, C. A.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-05
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
777-783
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2067019078
Cited by
3,044
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 272 · 2025: 252 · 2024: 223 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 183 · 2021: 166 · 2020: 154 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 70
FWCI
31.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (BSR 8605191)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
particulate organic matter, soil organic matter turnover, soil organic matter pools, grassland cultivation, tillage management, no-tillage, stubble mulch, bare fallow, mineral-associated organic matter, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, lignin, stable carbon isotopes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review