The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon Dynamics of Surface Residue– and Root‐derived Organic Matter under Simulated No‐till
Abstract
No‐till practices have the potential to increase soil organic C, but little is known about the relative contribution of surface residue and roots to soil organic C accumulation. In a simulated no‐till experiment, we studied the fate of 14 C‐labeled surface residue and in situ roots during a 1‐yr incubation. Soil samples collected during the incubation were chemically dispersed and separated into five particle size and density fractions. The organic C, 14 C, and total N content of each fraction was determined. Alkali traps were used to measure 14 C losses due to respiration. After 360 d, 66% of the 14 C contained in the surface residue on Day 0 had been respired as 14 CO 2 , 11% remained in residue on the soil surface, and 16% was in the soil. In comparison, 56% of the root‐derived 14 C in the soil was evolved as 14 CO 2 and 42% remained in the soil. The large (500–2000 μm) and small (53–500 μm) particulate organic matter (POM) fractions together contained 11 to 16% of the initial root‐derived 14 C in the soil. In contrast, POM contained only 1 to 3% of the inital surface residue–derived 14 C. These data show clear differences in the partitioning of surface residue– and root‐derived C during decomposition and imply that the beneficial effects of no‐till on soil organic C accrual are primarily due to the increased retention of root‐derived C in the soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen Management Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Tile‐Drained Midwestern Soils
Dinnes, D. L., Karlen, D. L., Jaynes, D. B., Kaspar, T. C., Hatfield, J. L., Colvin, T. S., & Cambardella, C. A. (2002) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2002.1530 · Cited by 1,010
Self-citationZhao, Y., Wang, M., Hu, S., Zhang, X., Ouyang, Z., Zhang, G., Huang, B., Zhao, S., Wu, J., Xie, D., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700292114 · Cited by 650
Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration
Lemus, R., & Lal, R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590910393 · Cited by 455
Lorenz, K., Lal, R., Preston, C. M., & Nierop, K. G. J. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.013 · Cited by 425
Chemical Composition of Crop Biomass Impacts Its Decomposition
Johnson, J. M.-F., Barbour, N. W., & Weyers, S. L. (2007) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0419 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Gale, W. J., & Cambardella, C. A.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 190-195
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2020526755
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Dynamics of Surface Residue– and Root‐derived Organic Matter under Simulated No‐till. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2000.641190x
- The paper
- Gale, W. J., & Cambardella, C. A. (2000). Carbon Dynamics of Surface Residue– and Root‐derived Organic Matter under Simulated No‐till. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.641190x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.