Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Release of Intracellular Solutes by Four Soil Bacteria Exposed to Dilution Stress

Halverson, Larry J., Jones, Thomas M., Firestone, Mary K.·2000·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

The physiological mechanisms utilized by soil bacteria for acclimation to sudden increases in soil water potential are poorly understood. In this study, we examined the physiological responses of soil isolates of Pseudomonas chlororaphis , P. fluorescens , Bacillus pumulis , and Streptomyces griseus to a sudden increase in solution water potential (dilution). Bacterial isolates were cultured at a low solute water potential (−3.0 MPa) and subjected to rapid water potential increase s of 0.5 to 2.0 MPa. The small amount of protein and DNA released by a 2.0 MPa dilution suggests that water potential increases up to 2.0 MPa did not cause significant cell lysis. In response to dilution, intracellular solutes were released into the extracellular environment rather than polymerized into osmotically less‐active compounds or catabolized to CO 2 In general, the Gram‐positive isolates B. pumulis and S. griseus were more tolerant to dilution than the Pseudomonas spp., since dilution had no effect on culturability, and the amount of solutes released was small (<10% of the intracellular solute pool). The Pseudomonas spp. released a maximum of 22 to 26% of their amino acid pool and 54 to 60% of their low molecular weight neutral sugar pool. The amounts of amino acids and low molecular weight carbohydrates released and the reduction in culturability was, in general, proportional to the magnitude of dilution. Pseudomonas fluorescens tolerated a 0.5 MPa water potential increase, but water potential shocks of greater magnitude resulted in a large reduction in culturability and an increase in the amount of solutes released. These results suggest that a potential source of mineralizable C following the wetting of dry soils is the release of organic compatible solutes from the microbial community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2000.6451630x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Halverson, L. J., Jones, T. M., & Firestone, M. K.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
1630-1637
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2049029636
Cited by
314
References
29
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Release of Intracellular Solutes by Four Soil Bacteria Exposed to Dilution Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2000.6451630x
The paper
Halverson, L. J., Jones, T. M., & Firestone, M. K. (2000). Release of Intracellular Solutes by Four Soil Bacteria Exposed to Dilution Stress. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6451630x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.