The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landscape‐Level Patterns of Microbial Community Composition and Substrate Use in Upland Forest Ecosystems
Abstract
The composition and diversity of biotic communities are controlled by the availability of growth‐limiting resources. Resource availability for microbial populations in soil is controlled by the amount and types of organic compounds entering soil from plant litter. Because plant communities differ in the amount and type of substrates entering soil, we reasoned that the composition and function of soil microbial communities should differ with the dominant vegetation. We tested this idea by studying two sugar maple ( Acer saccharum Marsh.)‐dominated and one oak ( Quercus spp.)‐dominated forest ecosystems in northern Lower Michigan that differ in rates of soil N cycling. We used phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis to gain insight into microbial community composition, and we used a subset of Biolog GN substrates found in root exudate to assess the metabolic capabilities soil microbial communities. Although microbial biomass did not differ among ecosystems, principal components analysis of bacterial, actinomycetal, and fungal PLFAs clearly separated the microbial communities of the three ecosystems. Similarly, principal components analysis separated microbial communities by differences in growth on carbohydrates, organic acids, and amino acids. Discrimination among microbial communities in the three ecosystems by PLFAs and substrate use occurred in spring, summer, and fall, but the individual PLFAs and substrates contributing to discrimination changed during the growing season. Our results indicate that floristically and edaphically distinct forest ecosystems also differ in microbial community composition and substrate use. This pattern was consistent across the growing season and repeatedly occurred across relatively large land areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brookes, P. C., Landman, A., Pruden, G., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1985) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0 · Cited by 5,828
Soil microbiology and biochemistry
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-6277 · Cited by 2,931
Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate
White, D. C., Davis, W. M., Nickels, J. S., King, J. D., & Bobbie, R. J. (1979) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00388810 · Cited by 1,702
Self-citationPrinciples and Applications of Soil Microbiology
(2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2018-0-05260-3 · Cited by 1,370
Functional diversity of microbial communities: A quantitative approach
ZAK, J., WILLIG, M., MOORHEAD, D., & WILDMAN, H. (1994) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(94)90131-7 · Cited by 1,303
Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests
Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., & Vogt, D. J. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60122-1 · Cited by 962
Lipid Analysis in Microbial Ecology
Vestal, J. R., & White, D. C. (1989) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310976 · Cited by 768
Self-citationCompositional and Functional Shifts in Microbial Communities Due to Soil Warming
Zogg, G. P., Zak, D. R., Ringelberg, D. B., White, D. C., MacDonald, N. W., & Pregitzer, K. S. (1997) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020015x · Cited by 758
Self-citationGarland, J. L. (1996) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00112-3 · Cited by 659
Forest Litter Decomposition in Relation to Soil Nitrogen Dynamics and Litter Quality
McClaugherty, C. A., Pastor, J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941327 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Gallo, M. E., Lauber, C., Waldrop, M. P., & Zak, D. R. (2005) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-7112-1 · Cited by 371
Self-citationVARIATION IN DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER CONTROLS BACTERIAL PRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
Judd, K. E., Crump, B. C., & Kling, G. W. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2068:vidomc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 344
Waldrop, M. P., & Firestone, M. K. (2004) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1419-9 · Cited by 310
Effects of inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on metal uptake by Brassica juncea
Wu, S. C., Cheung, K. C., Luo, Y. M., & Wong, M. H. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.023 · Cited by 287
Muhammad, N., Dai, Z., Xiao, K., Meng, J., Brookes, P. C., Liu, X., Wang, H., Wu, J., & Xu, J. (2014) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.023 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, R. T., Zak, D. R., White, D. C., & Peacock, A.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 359-367
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2157110683
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 20.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landscape‐Level Patterns of Microbial Community Composition and Substrate Use in Upland Forest Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2001.652359x
- The paper
- Myers, R. T., Zak, D. R., White, D. C., & Peacock, A. (2001). Landscape‐Level Patterns of Microbial Community Composition and Substrate Use in Upland Forest Ecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.652359x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.