Cited by 165Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

Changes in microbial community structure due to biochars generated from different feedstocks and their relationships with soil chemical properties

Muhammad, Niaz, Dai, Zhongmin, Xiao, Kongcao, Meng, Jun, Brookes, Philip C., Liu, Xingmei, Wang, Haizhen, Wu, Jianjun +1 more·2014·Geoderma

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.023

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muhammad et al. (2014) reported a significant positive correlation (r2 = 0.68; p < 0.05) of bacterial-to-fungal ratio with soil C/N ratio from slow pyrolysed biochars (500 °C) produced from swine manure, fruit peels, Brassica raba residues, and reed grass (Phragmites australis) that were incorporated to sandy loam soils.

    “Muhammad et al. (2014) reported a significant positive correlation (r 2 = 0.68; p < 0.05) of bacterial-to-fungal ratio with soil C/N ratio from slow pyrolysed biochars (500 °C) produced from swine manure, fruit peels, Brassica raba residues, and reed grass (Phragmites australis) that were incorporated to sandy loam soils.”

    From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Muhammad et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhammad, N., Dai, Z., Xiao, K., Meng, J., Brookes, P. C., Liu, X., Wang, H., Wu, J., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Jianjun
  • Xu, Jianming
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
226-227
Pages
270-278
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059783866
Cited by
164
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4
FWCI
19.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoderma (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB100502)
  • National Science and Technology Support Program (2012BAD05B04-3, 2012BAD15B04-2)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
biochar, soil microbial community structure, phospholipid fatty acids, pig manure, fruit peel, Phragmites australis, Brassica rapa, biochar feedstock, biochar application rate, soil chemical properties, soil pH, dissolved organic carbon, soil nitrogen, protozoa, sulfate reducers, carbon sequestration, sandy loam soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review