Short‐Term Dynamics of Root‐ and Shoot‐Derived Carbon from a Leguminous Green Manure
Abstract
Although roots are an important source of soil organic matter (SOM) and are thought to be the major constituent of the particulate organic matter (POM) fraction, few studies have documented the fate of belowground C inputs in situ. The main purpose of this experiment was to determine the fate of root‐derived C vs. shoot‐derived C and to identify factors contributing to any differences in the retention of aboveground vs. belowground C inputs. We labeled hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth subsp. villosa ) in situ with 13 CO 2 and followed both root‐ and shoot‐derived C in total soil organic C (SOC) and labile C pools for the first growing season following hairy vetch incorporation. At the end of the growing season, nearly one‐half of the root‐derived C was still present in the soil, whereas only 13% of shoot‐derived C remained. A greater proportion of root‐derived C was found as occluded POM and associated with the clay and silt fraction. Greater root‐derived C also was retained as chloroform‐extractable microbial biomass. We suggest that three different mechanisms contributed to the increased retention of root‐derived C: (i) the greater biochemical recalcitrance of root litter, (ii) increased physical protection of root‐derived POM within aggregates, and (iii) the continuous nature of root C inputs from exudates and fine root turnover. We conclude that shoot residues are broken down rapidly and serve as the source of N for the following cash crop, whereas the root litter is probably largely responsible for the short‐term soil structural improvements associated with the use of green manures. Furthermore, on the basis of these findings, we hypothesize that the greater retention of root‐derived C in the first 6 mo of decomposition will increase the persistence of this C in SOM in the long term.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leaf-litter, being more easily decomposable than root material, might have accelerated soil C cycling under woody crops, further enhancing the C content in the fPOM fraction and stimulating the formation of microaggregates, therefore improving the physical protection of C.
“Leaf-litter, being more easily decomposable than root material (Puget & Drinkwater, 2001;Kemp et al., 2003;Austin et al., 2009;D'Acunto et al., 2014), might have accelerated the soil C cycling under woody crops, further enhancing the C content in the fPOM fraction and stimulating the formation of microaggregates, therefore improving the physical protection of C (Helfrich et al., 2008;Cotrufo et al”
From Carbon sequestration potential in perennial bioenergy crops: the importance of organic matter inputs and its physical protection (2016) · cites this paper as Puget & Drinkwater, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., & Dignac, M.-F. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-0907-y · Cited by 1,861 · see citing works
Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input
Sokol, N. W., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Chemical Composition of Crop Biomass Impacts Its Decomposition
Johnson, J. M.-F., Barbour, N. W., & Weyers, S. L. (2007) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0419 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Chimento, C., Almagro, M., & Amaducci, S. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12232 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Hartman, J. C., Nippert, J. B., Orozco, R. A., & Springer, C. J. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.055 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Amougou, N., Bertrand, I., Machet, J.-M., & Recous, S. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0443-x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Cropping systems effects on improving soil carbon stocks of exposed subsoil
Al-Kaisi, M. M., & Grote, J. B. (2007) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2006.0200 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Puget, P., & Drinkwater, L. E.
- Affiliations
- Ecole Superieure d'Ingenieurs et de Techniciens Pour l'Agriculture 13, rue du Nord 76000 Rouen France
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Drinkwater, L.E.
- ORCID
- Drinkwater, L.E.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 771-779
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1965591123
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (96‐35107‐3194)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- root-derived carbon, green manure, hairy vetch, soil organic matter, particulate organic matter, carbon retention, 13C labeling, labile carbon pools, microbial biomass, soil aggregates, fine root turnover, root exudates, soil structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review